From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@analogic.com>,
vsu@altlinux.ru, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
laforge@gnumonks.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
security@linux.kernel.org, vendor-sec@lst.de
Subject: Re: [Security] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:02:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011200233.GB25581@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0510111505540.3821-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:13:39PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Surely Linux uses entirely original code, with no hangovers from the
> original AT&T Unix... Besides, to the best of my recollection, the two
> operations are equal in speed on a PDP-11.
I've no idea but I don't believe the relative speed of PDP_11 operations is
security critical in Linux so can you trim the cc line
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 15:13 [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Harald Welte
2005-09-27 8:04 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 9:13 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20050927110319.GD1980@piware.de>
2005-09-27 12:22 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:48 ` [vendor-sec] " Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 12:57 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 13:09 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 15:27 ` David Brownell
2005-09-27 14:53 ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:00 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:52 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 10:47 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 18:44 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 20:38 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 22:08 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 17:44 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-10 18:07 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-11 9:45 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 23:10 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-10-11 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-12 7:24 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-13 5:51 ` Horms
2005-10-11 13:57 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 22:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-10 20:03 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-10-11 8:28 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-11 17:58 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-11 19:13 ` Alan Stern
2005-10-11 20:02 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2005-09-27 17:20 ` PID reuse safety for userspace apps (Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio) Solar Designer
2005-09-27 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-27 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 21:16 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 21:03 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 16:58 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Alan Cox
2005-09-27 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 20:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-13 23:00 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-10-13 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-13 23:56 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011200233.GB25581@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=security@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vendor-sec@lst.de \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.