From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@linux.kernel.org,
vendor-sec@lst.de
Subject: Re: [vendor-sec] Re: [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:10:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051011231054.GA16315@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051011094550.GI4290@rama>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:45:51AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:07:45AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Harald Welte (laforge@gnumonks.org) wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> > > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > > @@ -1193,6 +1193,40 @@ kill_proc_info(int sig, struct siginfo *
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* like kill_proc_info(), but doesn't use uid/euid of "current" */
> >
> > Maybe additional comment reminding that you most likely don't want this
> > interface.
> >
> > Also, looks like there's same issue again:
>
> Mh, didn't hit that bug since I don't use disconnect signals. But it
> looks like it has the same issue.
>
> Please consider the patch below, it
>
> 1) changes pid_t to uid_t
> 2) exports the symbol
> 3) adresses the same task_struct referencing issue for disconnect
> signals
>
> I hope this now finally is the last take ;)
Ugh, but it looks like Linus already committed your previous patch, with
some changes by him. Care to send a delta from what is currently in his
tree (2.6.14-rc4 has it) and this patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-11 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 15:13 [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Harald Welte
2005-09-27 8:04 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 9:13 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20050927110319.GD1980@piware.de>
2005-09-27 12:22 ` [vendor-sec] " Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:48 ` [vendor-sec] " Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 12:57 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 12:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-27 13:09 ` Greg KH
2005-09-27 15:27 ` David Brownell
2005-09-27 14:53 ` [Security] " Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:00 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 16:52 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 10:47 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 18:44 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 20:38 ` Chris Wright
2005-09-30 22:08 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-30 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 17:44 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-10 18:07 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-11 9:45 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 23:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-10-11 23:44 ` [vendor-sec] " Linus Torvalds
2005-10-12 7:24 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-13 5:51 ` Horms
2005-10-11 13:57 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-10 22:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-10 20:03 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-10-11 8:28 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-11 17:58 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-11 19:13 ` Alan Stern
2005-10-11 20:02 ` [Security] " Alan Cox
2005-09-27 17:20 ` PID reuse safety for userspace apps (Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio) Solar Designer
2005-09-27 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-27 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 21:16 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 21:03 ` Solar Designer
2005-09-27 16:58 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Alan Cox
2005-09-27 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 20:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-13 23:00 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-10-13 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-13 23:56 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051011231054.GA16315@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=security@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vendor-sec@lst.de \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.