From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: udev user specified or human readable /dev names
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:53:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101225357.GA13215@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi -
Per posts and an accepted patch on dm-devel about dm multipath user
friendly names:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2005-October/msg00004.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2005-October/msg00067.html
But the above is a dm multipath only solution.
It's a good idea to allow user specified names on top of the
/dev/disk/by-* device names. Though dm likely needs a dm_id in order to
support the method outlined here.
If we could set and compare environment variables, or compare SYMLINK, a
separate rules file (doesn't have to be separate, just seems like a good
idea) could be used to add symlinks to user specified names.
i.e. move udev_rules.c:apply_format() into udev_utils.c, and call it
before comparison as well as before (AFAIUI) generating names, though I
somehow doubt the change is that simple.
Then, we could have rules like:
KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]|sr*|dasd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_SERIAL}=="?*", ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}="disk/by-id/$env{ID_BUS}-$env{ID_SERIAL}"
ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}=="?*", SYMLINK+="$env{ID_FULL_PATH}"
And for each device that we want to give a user specified name, use (would
also need partition specific rules):
ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}=="disk/by-id/scsi-360a98000686f68656c6e7a416f4b6849" SYMLINK+="media-files"
And similar for the other disk/by-* methods.
Any comments on the above?
Is my rule just wrong, or is there a better method?
Running with udev 069 on FC rawhide, with these rules:
SYMLINK=="*foo*" SYMLINK+="user/bar"
KERNEL="sdm" ENV{VAL1}="somevalue"
KERNEL="sdm" ENV{VAL2}="$env{VAL1}"
KERNEL="sdm" SYMLINK+="user/show-val1-$env{VAL1}"
KERNEL="sdm" SYMLINK+="user/show-val2-$env{VAL2}"
ENV{VAL1}=="somevalue" SYMLINK+="user/val1"
ENV{VAL2}=="somevalue" SYMLINK+="user/val2"
Do not work as might be expected: since the env values are not expanded,
the last rule never matches, and user/val2 link is never created. The
above generated (sdaz is the last device found):
[elm3a49 ~]$ ls -l /dev/user
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Nov 1 14:18 bar -> ../sdaz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 show-val1-somevalue -> ../sdm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 show-val2-somevalue -> ../sdm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 val1 -> ../sdm
-- Patrick Mansfield
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: udev user specified or human readable /dev names
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:53:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051101225357.GA13215@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi -
Per posts and an accepted patch on dm-devel about dm multipath user
friendly names:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2005-October/msg00004.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2005-October/msg00067.html
But the above is a dm multipath only solution.
It's a good idea to allow user specified names on top of the
/dev/disk/by-* device names. Though dm likely needs a dm_id in order to
support the method outlined here.
If we could set and compare environment variables, or compare SYMLINK, a
separate rules file (doesn't have to be separate, just seems like a good
idea) could be used to add symlinks to user specified names.
i.e. move udev_rules.c:apply_format() into udev_utils.c, and call it
before comparison as well as before (AFAIUI) generating names, though I
somehow doubt the change is that simple.
Then, we could have rules like:
KERNEL="sd*[!0-9]|sr*|dasd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_SERIAL}="?*", ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}="disk/by-id/$env{ID_BUS}-$env{ID_SERIAL}"
ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}="?*", SYMLINK+="$env{ID_FULL_PATH}"
And for each device that we want to give a user specified name, use (would
also need partition specific rules):
ENV{ID_FULL_PATH}="disk/by-id/scsi-360a98000686f68656c6e7a416f4b6849" SYMLINK+="media-files"
And similar for the other disk/by-* methods.
Any comments on the above?
Is my rule just wrong, or is there a better method?
Running with udev 069 on FC rawhide, with these rules:
SYMLINK="*foo*" SYMLINK+="user/bar"
KERNEL="sdm" ENV{VAL1}="somevalue"
KERNEL="sdm" ENV{VAL2}="$env{VAL1}"
KERNEL="sdm" SYMLINK+="user/show-val1-$env{VAL1}"
KERNEL="sdm" SYMLINK+="user/show-val2-$env{VAL2}"
ENV{VAL1}="somevalue" SYMLINK+="user/val1"
ENV{VAL2}="somevalue" SYMLINK+="user/val2"
Do not work as might be expected: since the env values are not expanded,
the last rule never matches, and user/val2 link is never created. The
above generated (sdaz is the last device found):
[elm3a49 ~]$ ls -l /dev/user
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Nov 1 14:18 bar -> ../sdaz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 show-val1-somevalue -> ../sdm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 show-val2-somevalue -> ../sdm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Nov 1 14:18 val1 -> ../sdm
-- Patrick Mansfield
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-01 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-01 22:53 Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2005-11-01 22:53 ` udev user specified or human readable /dev names Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 0:05 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 0:05 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 0:35 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 0:35 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 1:06 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 1:06 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 2:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 2:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 2:53 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 2:53 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 15:30 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 15:30 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-02 23:49 ` Kay Sievers
2005-11-02 23:49 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051101225357.GA13215@us.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.