From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hugh@veritas.com, rohit.seth@intel.com, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Hugetlb: Copy on Write support
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:56:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110005633.GO29402@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051110004907.GA17840@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:15:34PM -0800, William Lee Irwin wrote:
>> Did you do the audit of pte protection bits I asked about? If not, I'll
>> dredge them up and check to make sure.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:49:07AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> I still don't know what you're talking about here - you never
> responded to my mail asking for clarification. The hugepage code
> already relies on pte_mkwrite() and pte_wrprotect() working correctly,
> I don't see that COW makes any difference.
You appear to have a good idea of what's going on given that you've
reminded me of that reliance. It looks like I dropped that email packet
for some reason, sorry about that.
Acked-by: William Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>
-- wli
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hugh@veritas.com, rohit.seth@intel.com, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Hugetlb: Copy on Write support
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:56:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110005633.GO29402@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051110004907.GA17840@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:15:34PM -0800, William Lee Irwin wrote:
>> Did you do the audit of pte protection bits I asked about? If not, I'll
>> dredge them up and check to make sure.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:49:07AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> I still don't know what you're talking about here - you never
> responded to my mail asking for clarification. The hugepage code
> already relies on pte_mkwrite() and pte_wrprotect() working correctly,
> I don't see that COW makes any difference.
You appear to have a good idea of what's going on given that you've
reminded me of that reliance. It looks like I dropped that email packet
for some reason, sorry about that.
Acked-by: William Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>
-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-10 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 23:28 [PATCH 0/4] hugetlb: copy on write Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:28 ` Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] Hugetlb: Remove duplicate i_size check Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:36 ` Adam Litke
2005-11-10 0:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 0:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-09 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] Hugetlb: Rename find_lock_page to find_or_alloc_huge_page Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:37 ` Adam Litke
2005-11-10 0:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 0:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-09 23:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] Hugetlb: Reorganize hugetlb_fault to prepare for COW Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:38 ` Adam Litke
2005-11-10 0:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 0:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-09 23:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] Hugetlb: Copy on Write support Adam Litke
2005-11-09 23:39 ` Adam Litke
2005-11-10 0:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 0:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 0:49 ` David Gibson
2005-11-10 0:49 ` David Gibson
2005-11-10 0:56 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2005-11-10 0:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 1:52 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-10 1:52 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-10 3:54 ` David Gibson
2005-11-10 3:54 ` David Gibson
2005-11-10 4:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-10 4:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051110005633.GO29402@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.