From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:05:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512070105.40169.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051205202707.GH15201@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 05 December 2005 15:27, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > The name parameter of platform_device_register_simple should be of
> > type const char * instead of char *, as we simply pass it to
> > platform_device_alloc, where it has type const char *.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> However, I've been wondering whether we want to keep this "simple"
> interface around long-term given that we now have a more flexible
> platform device allocation interface - I don't particularly like
> having superfluous interfaces for folk to get confused with.
Now that you made platform_device_alloc install default release
handler there is no need to have the _simple interface. I will
convert input devices (main users of _simple) to the new interface
and then we can get rid of it.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 20:23 [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype Jean Delvare
2005-12-05 20:27 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 6:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2005-12-07 17:04 ` Greg KH
2005-12-08 21:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 21:37 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:26 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 17:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:08 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 18:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 19:03 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 22:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 22:51 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 22:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 23:06 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 23:21 ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:17 ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:52 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 23:22 ` Russell King
2005-12-10 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-11 19:44 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-12 2:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-12-07 19:05 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 6:50 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-07 9:24 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200512070105.40169.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.