All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:50:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051207075032.5e968a5a.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051205202707.GH15201@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi Russell,

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > The name parameter of platform_device_register_simple should be of
> > type const char * instead of char *, as we simply pass it to
> > platform_device_alloc, where it has type const char *.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> 
> However, I've been wondering whether we want to keep this "simple"
> interface around long-term given that we now have a more flexible
> platform device allocation interface - I don't particularly like
> having superfluous interfaces for folk to get confused with.

What is the new preferred interface? Is it already in mainline or only
in -mm? I am writing a new platform driver, and am using
platform_device_interface_simple for now. It works just fine, but if
it is going to be deprecated soon, I better update my driver before I
submit it for inclusion.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-07  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-05 20:23 [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype Jean Delvare
2005-12-05 20:27 ` Russell King
2005-12-07  6:05   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 17:04     ` Greg KH
2005-12-08 21:21       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 21:37         ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:49           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:26           ` Russell King
2005-12-07 17:59     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:08       ` Russell King
2005-12-07 18:23         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 19:03           ` Russell King
2005-12-07 22:18             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 22:51               ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 22:59                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 23:06                   ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 23:21                     ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:58                       ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:06                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:17                         ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:52                   ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 23:22                     ` Russell King
2005-12-10 15:49                       ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-11 19:44                     ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-12  2:08                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:11       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:39         ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-12-07 19:05           ` Russell King
2005-12-07  6:50   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2005-12-07  9:24     ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051207075032.5e968a5a.khali@linux-fr.org \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.