All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:14:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512090914.21436.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051209014658.GA11856@waste.org>

Am Freitag, 9. Dezember 2005 02:46 schrieb Matt Mackall:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:15:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ohh, and before I forget, besides the fact that this should speed 
> > > things up a little bit it also has the added benefit of reducing the 
> > > size of the generated code. The original kernel/exit.o file was 19604 
> > > bytes in size, the patched one is 19508 bytes in size.
> > 
> > nice. Just to underline your point, on x86, with gcc 4.0.2, i'm getting 
> > this with your patch:
> > 
> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> >   11077       0       0   11077    2b45 exit.o.orig
> >   10997       0       0   10997    2af5 exit.o
> > 
> > so 80 bytes shaved off. I think such patches also increase readability.
> 
> Readability improved: good.
> 37 lines of patch for 80-100 bytes saved: not so good.
> 
> So while this is a good style direction, I don't think it's worth the
> churn. And unlike kzalloc and the like, this particular optimization
> is perfectly doable by a compiler. So I'd rather wait for the compiler
> to get smarter than change code for such modest improvements.

How can the compiler do it? If a function call is between two evaluations
of a pointer chain, the compiler would have to make sure no pointer in
the chain is touched. For the case of a computed function call, it is
impossible in principle.

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-09  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-06 22:02 [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example) Jesper Juhl
2005-12-06 22:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09  1:46   ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09  8:14     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2005-12-09 18:22       ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09 10:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09 18:34       ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200512090914.21436.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.