From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:34:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051209183420.GR8637@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051209102914.GA16164@elte.hu>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:29:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Ohh, and before I forget, besides the fact that this should speed
> > > > things up a little bit it also has the added benefit of reducing the
> > > > size of the generated code. The original kernel/exit.o file was 19604
> > > > bytes in size, the patched one is 19508 bytes in size.
> > >
> > > nice. Just to underline your point, on x86, with gcc 4.0.2, i'm getting
> > > this with your patch:
> > >
> > > text data bss dec hex filename
> > > 11077 0 0 11077 2b45 exit.o.orig
> > > 10997 0 0 10997 2af5 exit.o
> > >
> > > so 80 bytes shaved off. I think such patches also increase readability.
> >
> > Readability improved: good.
> > 37 lines of patch for 80-100 bytes saved: not so good.
>
> i'd take a 37 lines readability patch even if it didnt give us a byte of
> text back. The fact that it also reduces text size on the latest gcc in
> rawhide is an added bonus. (of course the patch is 2.6.16 material)
So long as we're primarily doing it for the former reason rather than
the latter.
> furthermore, i think that even if it's a small step, we should encourage
> every effort that reduces the kernel's text size. The 2.4 -> 2.6
> transition blew up the kernel by ~50%, and we've got to win back some of
> that. (Kernel size is one of the main disadvantages of Linux in the
> embedded market, compared to other OSs.)
Boggle. You're telling /me/ this? You're the one who's been adding all
the damn features!
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 22:02 [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example) Jesper Juhl
2005-12-06 22:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09 1:46 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09 8:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-09 18:22 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09 18:34 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051209183420.GR8637@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.