From: Peter Surda <surda@shurdix.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] wrr vs. htb
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:00:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2005626170412053@mail.routehat.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fad9d48405072603541bc984b7@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:54:17 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Guys
hi
>I don't know how healthy this is, and I don't have a clue on how to
>improve the performance or lessen the load on the box. I've also been
>contemplating moving the setup to a WRR-based solution, but I'm not
>too sure if WRR can equally share local and gateway traffic as
>different 'flows'.
I don't understand this "2 kinds of traffic" concept. Where is the server? In
the internet or local? If local, why the need to shape it at all? I can
acknowledge though that under certain circumstances when you have several
parallel WRR qdiscs, it leads to freezes. Perhaps if you explain in more detail
what the network looks like I can give your more precise answers.
>If possible, just share your thoughts on the best way to handle this
>scenario with the 'dual' shaping, different speeds for traffic
>originating from the network server and internet traffic flowing
>through the server. The main emphasis is on equality, everyone on the
>network needs to be happy.
WRR is perfect when you need equality. [advertisement]Check out shurdix cough
cough[/advertisement].
>Kind regards
>Kenneth Kalmer
Yours sincerely,
Peter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-26 10:54 [LARTC] wrr vs. htb Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-26 15:00 ` Peter Surda [this message]
2005-07-27 10:01 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-27 13:47 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-27 22:23 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2005626170412053@mail.routehat.org \
--to=surda@shurdix.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.