Re: [LARTC] wrr vs. htb

[Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com>]

On 7/27/05, Peter Surda <surda@shurdix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:01:06 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >It's one server, fulfilling two functions, gateway en network service delivery
> Ok, now I get it. You can use IMQ and that will solve the problem. Or you can
> use a separate computer as a gateway.
> 
> >                 :0 HTB
> >               /     \
> >   (HTB) 1:0     2:0 (HTB)
> >              |         |
> >    WRR 1:1     1:2 WRR
> WRR doesn't like situations like this (don't ask why, some bug somewhere), the
> computer tends to  freeze unpredictably.

Ouch, well now each of the WRR discs will be replaced by HTB discs for
each user, currently 140 discs for each WRR disc... Any other ways to
do this, or will HTB cope? This can expand up to 2x 509 discs...

How can I then handle the equality issues better, should I just pray
that HTB will divide all excess fairly? Also, I forgot to mention that
each HTB for each client get's an SFQ as well, just so that they don't
kill themselves in the process. Is this kosher?

Thanks


-- 

Kenneth Kalmer
kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com

Folding@home stats
http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&username=kenneth%2Ekalmer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc