From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: paulmck@us.ibm.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
manfred@colorfullife.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:09:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601070209.02157.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060106.161721.124249301.davem@davemloft.net>
On Saturday 07 January 2006 01:17, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> I mean something like this patch:
Looks like a good idea to me.
I always disliked the per chain spinlocks even for other hash tables like
TCP/UDP multiplex - it would be much nicer to use a much smaller separately
hashed lock table and save cache. In this case the special case of using
a one entry only lock hash table makes sense.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-07 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060105235845.967478000@sorel.sous-sol.org>
2006-01-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers/net/sungem.c: gem_remove_one mustnt be __devexit Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] ieee80211_crypt_tkip depends on NET_RADIO Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] Insanity avoidance in /proc (CVE-2005-4605) Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] sysctl: dont overflow the user-supplied buffer with 0 Chris Wright
2006-01-06 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-06 3:40 ` Chris Wright
2006-01-06 10:17 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:52 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency (Version 2), HOTPLUG_CPU fix Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:58 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:26 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 22:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 14:45 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-06 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07 0:17 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 1:09 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-01-07 7:10 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 7:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 7:44 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 7:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-07 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:24 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 0:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] UFS: inode->i_sem is not released in error path Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] [ATYFB]: Fix onboard video on SPARC Blade 100 for 2.6.{13,14,15} Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601070209.02157.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.