All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ak@suse.de, paulmck@us.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:53:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BF7390.6050005@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060106.234440.53993868.davem@davemloft.net>

David S. Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:34:35 +0100
> 
>> I agree, I do use a hashed spinlock array on my local tree for TCP,
>> mainly to reduce the hash table size by a 2 factor.
> 
> So what do you think about going to a single spinlock for the
> routing cache?

I have no problem with this, since the biggest server I have is 4 way, but are 
you sure big machines wont suffer from this single spinlock ?

Also I dont understand what you want to do after this single spinlock patch.
How is it supposed to help the 'ip route flush cache' problem ?

In my case, I have about 600.000 dst-entries :

# grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo
ip_dst_cache      616250 622440    320   12    1 : tunables   54   27    8 : 
slabdata  51870  51870      0


Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-07  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060105235845.967478000@sorel.sous-sol.org>
2006-01-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:45   ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers/net/sungem.c: gem_remove_one mustnt be __devexit Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:45   ` [PATCH 2/6] ieee80211_crypt_tkip depends on NET_RADIO Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:45   ` [PATCH 3/6] Insanity avoidance in /proc (CVE-2005-4605) Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:45   ` [PATCH 4/6] sysctl: dont overflow the user-supplied buffer with 0 Chris Wright
2006-01-06  1:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-06  3:40       ` Chris Wright
2006-01-06 10:17       ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:52         ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency (Version 2), HOTPLUG_CPU fix Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:58         ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:09           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:26           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 22:18             ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:37         ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 14:00           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 14:45             ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 16:47           ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 17:19             ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 20:26               ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 20:33                 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-06 20:57                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07  0:17                   ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07  1:09                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07  7:10                       ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07  7:34                       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07  7:44                         ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07  7:53                           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-01-07  8:36                             ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 20:30                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-07  8:30                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:24         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06  0:46   ` [PATCH 5/6] UFS: inode->i_sem is not released in error path Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:46   ` [PATCH 6/6] [ATYFB]: Fix onboard video on SPARC Blade 100 for 2.6.{13,14,15} Chris Wright
2006-01-06  0:53   ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43BF7390.6050005@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.