From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:08:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601122108.55103.mason@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060112124717.6e242802.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thursday 12 January 2006 15:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > hm, yes, try_to_free_buffers() against a blockdev page is a problem.
> > > But I think it's fixable.
> > >
> > > In the second loop of drop_buffers(), if we find a bh which had a write
> > > error we need to set AS_EIO on the address_space which is interested in
> > > this buffer.
> > >
> > > That address_space is pinned by a) the fact that it has buffers at
> > > ->private_list and b) we hold the blockdev mapping's private_lock.
> > >
> > > The only problem is actually _finding_ the address_space which is
> > > interested in this buffer_head. Looks like we'd need a backpointer in
> > > the buffer_head.
> >
> > Yes, the pointer seems to be inevitable in this solution. If you think
> > the improvement is worth adding 4 bytes to each buffer_head, then I can
> > write the patch.
>
> hm. It only affects what are now rarely-used filesystems like ext2, minix,
> etc. Not sure about reiser3. But it is a strict correctness issue. I
> suppose we should do it. It'd be nice to find a way to avoid increasing
> the bh size..
>
I know my patch is pretty nasty, but is it really worth adding complexity to
the base code for this corner case?
> It'll be a hard patch to test.
I'll dig up $partner. They had a nasty test suite for that kind of thing.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-13 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-11 17:43 [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync Jan Kara
2006-01-12 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 11:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 13:58 ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 14:21 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 15:36 ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 16:32 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 14:26 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-13 2:08 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2006-01-13 2:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 22:46 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-18 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-19 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 13:41 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-20 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:55 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-23 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:32 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-22 23:31 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601122108.55103.mason@suse.com \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.