From: mita@miraclelinux.com (Akinobu Mita)
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace:
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:05:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060117070534.GA10785@miraclelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601161322.12209.ak@suse.de>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:22:11PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > b) I can't find useful usage for the symbol size in print_symbol().
> > And symbolsize seems to be fixed when vmlinux or modules are compiled.
> > So we can calculate it from vmlinux or modules.
> > How about removing the field of symbolsize in print_symbol()?
> >
> > [<ffffffffa008ef6c>] kjournald+0x406 [jbd]
>
> It's a double check that the oops is matching the vmlinux you're looking
> at.
If we add system_utsname.version in oops so that we can compare with
linux_banner[] in vmlinux, Will it be more precise and easier way to
double check than checking symbolsize?
--- 2.6-git/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c.orig 2006-01-17 12:45:41.000000000 +0900
+++ 2.6-git/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-01-17 12:49:35.000000000 +0900
@@ -239,9 +239,10 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs
}
print_modules();
printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU: %d\nEIP: %04x:[<%08lx>] %s VLI\n"
- "EFLAGS: %08lx (%s) \n",
+ "EFLAGS: %08lx (%s %s) \n",
smp_processor_id(), 0xffff & regs->xcs, regs->eip,
- print_tainted(), regs->eflags, system_utsname.release);
+ print_tainted(), regs->eflags, system_utsname.release,
+ system_utsname.version);
print_symbol(KERN_EMERG "EIP is at %s\n", regs->eip);
printk(KERN_EMERG "eax: %08lx ebx: %08lx ecx: %08lx edx: %08lx\n",
regs->eax, regs->ebx, regs->ecx, regs->edx);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-17 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-16 12:16 [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace: Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] makes print_symbol() return int Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-16 14:24 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 15:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-16 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] use usual call trace format on x86-64 Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 12:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-16 12:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] omit symbol size field in print_symbol() Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 14:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-16 15:51 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-17 7:06 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace: Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 13:41 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 13:41 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 13:42 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 22:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-17 16:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17 7:05 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060117070534.GA10785@miraclelinux.com \
--to=mita@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.