All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/9] uml: avoid sysfs warning on hot-unplug
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:12:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060118011200.GA28086@kroah.com> (raw)

> From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
> 
> Define a release method for the ubd and network driver so that sysfs doesn't
> complain when one is removed via:

What?  No.  The kernel is complaining for a reason, don't try to
out-smart it.

> 
> host $ uml_mconsole <umid> remove <dev>
> 
> Done by Jeff around January for ubd only, later lost, then restored in his tree
> - however I'm merging it now since there's no reason to leave this here.
> 
> We don't need to do any cleanup in the new added method, because when hot-unplug
> is done by uml_mconsole we already handle cleanup in mconsole infrastructure,
> i.e.  mc_device->remove (net_remove/ubd_remove), which is also the calling
> method.

Huh?  You have 2 different release functions for the same object?  And
how do you know which one is correct?  That does not sound right at all.

Please fix this correctly.

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] uml: avoid sysfs warning on hot-unplug
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:12:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060118011200.GA28086@kroah.com> (raw)

> From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
> 
> Define a release method for the ubd and network driver so that sysfs doesn't
> complain when one is removed via:

What?  No.  The kernel is complaining for a reason, don't try to
out-smart it.

> 
> host $ uml_mconsole <umid> remove <dev>
> 
> Done by Jeff around January for ubd only, later lost, then restored in his tree
> - however I'm merging it now since there's no reason to leave this here.
> 
> We don't need to do any cleanup in the new added method, because when hot-unplug
> is done by uml_mconsole we already handle cleanup in mconsole infrastructure,
> i.e.  mc_device->remove (net_remove/ubd_remove), which is also the calling
> method.

Huh?  You have 2 different release functions for the same object?  And
how do you know which one is correct?  That does not sound right at all.

Please fix this correctly.

thanks,

greg k-h

             reply	other threads:[~2006-01-18  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18  1:12 Greg KH [this message]
2006-01-18  1:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] uml: avoid sysfs warning on hot-unplug Greg KH
2006-01-18 11:53 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2006-01-18 11:53   ` Blaisorblade
2006-01-18 17:02   ` Greg KH
2006-01-18 17:02     ` Greg KH
2006-01-18 18:36     ` Blaisorblade
2006-01-18 18:36       ` Blaisorblade
     [not found] <20060117235659.14622.18544.stgit@zion.home.lan>
2006-01-18  0:19 ` [uml-devel] " Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18  2:53   ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2006-01-18 11:11     ` Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060118011200.GA28086@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.