* [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference
@ 2006-01-19 20:10 Håkon Løvdal
2006-01-19 20:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-20 2:19 ` Håkon Løvdal
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Håkon Løvdal @ 2006-01-19 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
From: Håkon Løvdal <Hakon.Lovdal@ericsson.com>
Removed a line promising that users still could run a.out user programs.
As far as I know all distributions have removed libc.4 support years
ago, so while the kernel itself still might support a.out, the promise
is both 1) not needed anymore and 2) most likely not correct.
Signed-off-by: Håkon Løvdal <Hakon.Lovdal@ericsson.com>
---
--- linux-2.6.15.1/README.ldp 2006-01-19 14:13:11.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15.1/README 2006-01-19 14:13:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -189,8 +189,6 @@
Also remember to upgrade your binutils package (for as/ld/nm and company)
if necessary. For more information, refer to Documentation/Changes.
- Please note that you can still run a.out user programs with this kernel.
-
- Do a "make" to create a compressed kernel image. It is also
possible to do "make install" if you have lilo installed to suit the
kernel makefiles, but you may want to check your particular lilo
setup first.
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference
2006-01-19 20:10 [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference Håkon Løvdal
@ 2006-01-19 20:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-20 2:19 ` Håkon Løvdal
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2006-01-19 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:10:29PM +0100, H?kon L?vdal wrote:
> Removed a line promising that users still could run a.out user programs.
> As far as I know all distributions have removed libc.4 support years
> ago, so while the kernel itself still might support a.out, the promise
> is both 1) not needed anymore and 2) most likely not correct.
Don't be silly. Some people still use libc4, as well as old binaries
which are statically linked.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference
2006-01-19 20:10 [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference Håkon Løvdal
2006-01-19 20:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2006-01-20 2:19 ` Håkon Løvdal
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Håkon Løvdal @ 2006-01-20 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
On 1/19/06, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:10:29PM +0100, H?kon L?vdal wrote:
> > Removed a line promising that users still could run a.out user programs.
> > As far as I know all distributions have removed libc.4 support years
> > ago, so while the kernel itself still might support a.out, the promise
> > is both 1) not needed anymore and 2) most likely not correct.
>
> Don't be silly. Some people still use libc4, as well as old binaries
> which are statically linked.
>
The above was a very poor attempt of saying that nobody needs that line
(anymore). Let me try to clarify.
I am not suggesting removal of a.out support from the kernel.
I am suggesting removal of this line from the README file.
Yes the content of the line is still true, but what value does it have?
The kernel has supported running a.out binaries (while the kernel itself
is elf) for around a decade. Everybody that still uses a.out knows this.
The kernel support for a.out is controlled by and documented with the
config flag BINFMT_AOUT (or IA32_AOUT or BINFMT_AOUT32).
Why should the README file mention anything about a.out?
The line does not provide new information to anyone and is at best
redundant information. At worst it causes information overload or
confusion. Therefore I think it should be removed.
To view this from the opposite situation, if this line was not present
in the current kernel, why would you then add it and for whom would it
provide useful information?
BR Håkon Løvdal
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-20 2:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-19 20:10 [KJ] [PATCH 2/5] README: Remove a.out reference Håkon Løvdal
2006-01-19 20:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-20 2:19 ` Håkon Løvdal
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.