From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [KJ] Re: Fixing make mandocs
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:52:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601230552.09142.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060122204921.613349e5.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Monday 23 January 2006 05:49, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:31:27 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >
> > Here would be a good janitor task for 2.6.16. make mandocs currently
> > doesn't build because a number of descriptions are missing parameters etc.
> > It would be good if someone could fix that and submit patches for 2.6.16.
> >
> > It should be relatively straight forward, if one cannot figure out
> > what a missing parameter does adding a dummy description ("Undocumented")
> > would be also ok.
> >
> > -Andi
>
> Lots of these have been fixed in the last 2-3 days by Martin Waitz
> and/or me and have been posted on lkml. Martin is collecting them
> in his kernel-doc tree.
Ok good. Are they going into 2.6.16?
-Andi
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fixing make mandocs
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:52:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601230552.09142.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060122204921.613349e5.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Monday 23 January 2006 05:49, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:31:27 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >
> > Here would be a good janitor task for 2.6.16. make mandocs currently
> > doesn't build because a number of descriptions are missing parameters etc.
> > It would be good if someone could fix that and submit patches for 2.6.16.
> >
> > It should be relatively straight forward, if one cannot figure out
> > what a missing parameter does adding a dummy description ("Undocumented")
> > would be also ok.
> >
> > -Andi
>
> Lots of these have been fixed in the last 2-3 days by Martin Waitz
> and/or me and have been posted on lkml. Martin is collecting them
> in his kernel-doc tree.
Ok good. Are they going into 2.6.16?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 4:31 [KJ] Fixing make mandocs Andi Kleen
2006-01-23 4:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-23 4:49 ` [KJ] " Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 4:49 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 4:52 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-01-23 4:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-23 4:53 ` [KJ] " Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 4:53 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 12:28 ` [KJ] " Martin Waitz
2006-01-23 12:28 ` Martin Waitz
2006-01-23 12:52 ` [KJ] " Andi Kleen
2006-01-23 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601230552.09142.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.