From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Han <xiphux@gmail.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Jake Moilanen <moilanen@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060123215231.04b38886@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138047938.21481.11.camel@mindpipe>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:25:37 -0500
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> This seems right to me, how do you expect X to be treated by the
> scheduler?
Why moving the mouse a little (that causes a microscopic % of CPU
being used) makes X priority jump up to 29 from 6/7 ???
And why this doesn't happen when glxgears (for example) is running?
(under cpu load this is different, with X never getting "good"
priority -- if I remember correctly)
Maybe this is normal and depends on the way X sleeps or something...
I don't know much about schedulers but if I'm able to make the cursor
going in jerks with just a bit of CPU load (linux$ make -j16, for
example) I wonder why X cannot get a better priority...
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.16-rc1-plugsched on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 21:45 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1 Peter Williams
2006-01-21 6:48 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-21 10:46 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-21 23:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-22 22:47 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 0:49 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 20:21 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-24 0:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 1:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 8:11 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-26 22:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-28 23:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-31 17:44 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:09 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 20:52 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2006-01-23 20:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 21:10 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 21:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 23:32 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060123215231.04b38886@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moilanen@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=xiphux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.