From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Han <xiphux@gmail.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Jake Moilanen <moilanen@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060123221017.2d393c83@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138049979.21481.25.camel@mindpipe>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:59:38 -0500
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> > Maybe this is normal and depends on the way X sleeps or something...
> >
>
> Because the scheduler favors interactive tasks (aka those which spend a
> large % of time waiting on external events) and X is only considered
> interactive when the mouse is being moved. When glxgears is running
> it's CPU bound and is therefore penalized.
??
The reverse... lower priority number means BETTER priority. So Actually
X is penalized when I'm moving the mouse.
And running "glxgears" doesn't make X CPU bounded if direct rendering
is enabled -- it is GPU bounded...
In fact I can run "glxgears" and still have 97% of IDLE CPU time.
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.16-rc1-plugsched on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 21:45 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1 Peter Williams
2006-01-21 6:48 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-21 10:46 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-21 23:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-22 22:47 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 0:49 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 20:21 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-24 0:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 1:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 8:11 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-26 22:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-28 23:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-31 17:44 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:09 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 20:52 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 21:10 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2006-01-23 21:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 23:32 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060123221017.2d393c83@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moilanen@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=xiphux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.