From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] non-refcounted pages, application to slab?
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:18:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060125111829.GD30421@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D75CB8.9090101@cosmosbay.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> So we cannot change atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v) but introduce a new
> function like :
>
> int atomic_dec_refcount(atomic_t *v)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* avoid an atomic op if we are the last user of this refcount */
> if (atomic_read(v) == 1) {
> atomic_set(v, 0); /* not a real atomic op on most machines */
> return 1;
> }
> #endif
> return atomic_dec_and_test(v);
> }
>
> The cost of the extra conditional branch is worth, if it can avoid an
> atomic op.
>
If it can always avoid an atomic op then the conditional branch is
useless, and if it can avoid the atomic op in 20% of cases then it
might still be useless (especially considering the extra icache).
Actual measurements would be required I think.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] non-refcounted pages, application to slab?
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:18:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060125111829.GD30421@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D75CB8.9090101@cosmosbay.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> So we cannot change atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v) but introduce a new
> function like :
>
> int atomic_dec_refcount(atomic_t *v)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* avoid an atomic op if we are the last user of this refcount */
> if (atomic_read(v) == 1) {
> atomic_set(v, 0); /* not a real atomic op on most machines */
> return 1;
> }
> #endif
> return atomic_dec_and_test(v);
> }
>
> The cost of the extra conditional branch is worth, if it can avoid an
> atomic op.
>
If it can always avoid an atomic op then the conditional branch is
useless, and if it can avoid the atomic op in 20% of cases then it
might still be useless (especially considering the extra icache).
Actual measurements would be required I think.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-25 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-25 9:39 [RFC] non-refcounted pages, application to slab? Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 9:39 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 9:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 9:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 9:56 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 9:56 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 10:57 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 10:57 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 11:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 11:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-25 11:18 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-01-25 11:18 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 10:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-25 10:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-25 11:00 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 11:00 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-25 11:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-25 11:19 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060125111829.GD30421@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.