All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	dada1@cosmosbay.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, mingo@elte.hu, axboe@suse.de,
	anton@samba.org, wli@holomorphy.com, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:23:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060207185355.GC5771@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602071036050.3854@g5.osdl.org>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:43:55AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > 
> > One would think so, but I recall not all archs did that. Alpha for
> > example sets up cpu_possible_map in smp_prepare_cpus(). It however
> > makes more sense to fix the arch then use NR_CPUS, IMO.
> 
> Ehh? alpha does it in setup_smp(), which in turn is called very early from 
> setup_arch().
> 
> Were you perhaps thinking of something else? Or am I just going blind and 
> confused?

I am looking at 2.6.16-rc1 and I don't see cpu_possible_map
being set in setup_smp(). That said, it seems alpha setup_smp()
probes for cpus there, so there is no reason why it cannot
be set there. I think it is wrong not to set cpu_possible_map
very early.

Or perhaps it got fixed later on, in which case, oh well, I need
to download more often. <sigh>.

Thanks
Dipankar

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-07 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200602051959.k15JxoHK001630@hera.kernel.org>
2006-02-07 15:15 ` [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens
2006-02-07 15:31   ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-07 16:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-07 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 17:34       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 17:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:30           ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-07 18:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:53               ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2006-02-07 19:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-08  4:40                   ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-08  8:55                   ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2006-02-08 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  1:20     ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  3:05   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  3:08     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:36       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:45         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:56           ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 16:08           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 16:13             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 16:38               ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09 16:59               ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 17:37               ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:05                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-10 10:13                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-11 14:49                     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-11 18:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-09 17:03             ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 17:23               ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 18:04               ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 18:52                 ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 20:37                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 21:03                     ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-10 10:02                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:42                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:09                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-10 11:23                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:26                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 14:13                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-11  0:10                           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-11  0:25                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 12:10                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 19:08                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:39   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:46     ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-09  8:32 Chuck Ebbert
2006-02-09  8:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09  9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  9:11   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:08     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:13       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:23         ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:31           ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 11:47             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 12:46               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09 13:12                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060207185355.GC5771@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.