All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, ak@muc.de, 76306.1226@compuserve.com,
	wli@holomorphy.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:23:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060209172342.GN18730@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060209090321.A9380@unix-os.sc.intel.com>

Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:08:09AM -0800, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > 
> >    powerpc/ppc64, for instance, determines the number of possible cpus
> >    from information exported by firmware (and I'm mystified as to why
> >    other platforms don't do this).  So it's typical to have a kernel an a
> >    pSeries partition with NR_CPUS=128, but cpu_possible_map = 0xff.
> > 
> 
> Iam assuming in the above ase, cpu_possible_map == cpu_present_map and both
> dont change after the OS is booted. v.s in platforms capable of hot-plug
> cpus present could grow up to cpu_possible_map (max) when a new cpu is
> newly added, that wasnt even present at boot time.

No, cpu_present_map need not equal cpu_possible_map.  Of course
cpu_possible_map doesn't change after boot, but cpu_present_map can.
Apart from that, I don't really understand what you're trying to say
here.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-09 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200602051959.k15JxoHK001630@hera.kernel.org>
2006-02-07 15:15 ` [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens
2006-02-07 15:31   ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-07 16:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-07 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 17:34       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 17:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:30           ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-07 18:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:53               ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-07 19:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-08  4:40                   ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-08  8:55                   ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2006-02-08 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  1:20     ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  3:05   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  3:08     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:36       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:45         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:56           ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 16:08           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 16:13             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 16:38               ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09 16:59               ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 17:37               ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:05                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-10 10:13                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-11 14:49                     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-11 18:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-09 17:03             ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 17:23               ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-02-09 18:04               ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 18:52                 ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 20:37                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 21:03                     ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-10 10:02                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:42                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:09                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-10 11:23                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:26                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 14:13                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-11  0:10                           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-11  0:25                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 12:10                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 19:08                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:39   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:46     ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-09  8:32 Chuck Ebbert
2006-02-09  8:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09  9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  9:11   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:08     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:13       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:23         ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:31           ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 11:47             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 12:46               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09 13:12                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060209172342.GN18730@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.