All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
  2006-02-23 12:54 RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1! Serge Noiraud
@ 2006-02-23 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
  2006-02-23 13:01   ` Serge Noiraud
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2006-02-23 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Serge Noiraud; +Cc: linux-kernel


* Serge Noiraud <serge.noiraud@bull.net> wrote:

> These messages occurs while my RT program loops.

what priority does your RT program have?

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
@ 2006-02-23 12:54 Serge Noiraud
  2006-02-23 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Serge Noiraud @ 2006-02-23 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ingo Molnar

Hi,
	I get the following messages :

BUG: tsc:6796, possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
 [<c01047ec>] dump_stack+0x1c/0x20 (20)
 [<c014b3a7>] softlockup_detected+0x37/0x50 (24)
 [<c014b493>] softlockup_tick+0xd3/0xf0 (24)
 [<c012b013>] update_process_times+0x83/0x90 (16)
 [<c013da2d>] handle_update+0x1d/0x20 (12)
 [<c013dada>] handle_nextevent_update+0x1a/0x20 (12)
 [<c01137b3>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x73/0x80 (16)
 [<c0104361>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x21/0x30 (-868712892)
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00010000 ]
| 0-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------

BUG: tsc:6796, possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
 [<c01047ec>] dump_stack+0x1c/0x20 (20)
 [<c014b3a7>] softlockup_detected+0x37/0x50 (24)
 [<c014b493>] softlockup_tick+0xd3/0xf0 (24)
 [<c012b013>] update_process_times+0x83/0x90 (16)
 [<c013da2d>] handle_update+0x1d/0x20 (12)
 [<c013dada>] handle_nextevent_update+0x1a/0x20 (12)
 [<c01137b3>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x73/0x80 (16)
 [<c0104361>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x21/0x30 (-868712892)
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00010000 ]
| 0-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------

BUG: tsc:6821, possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
 [<c01047ec>] dump_stack+0x1c/0x20 (20)
 [<c014b3a7>] softlockup_detected+0x37/0x50 (24)
 [<c014b493>] softlockup_tick+0xd3/0xf0 (24)
 [<c012b013>] update_process_times+0x83/0x90 (16)
 [<c013da2d>] handle_update+0x1d/0x20 (12)
 [<c013dada>] handle_nextevent_update+0x1a/0x20 (12)
 [<c01137b3>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x73/0x80 (16)
 [<c0104361>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x21/0x30 (-870324188)
---------------------------
| preempt count: 00010000 ]
| 0-level deep critical section nesting:
----------------------------------------

These messages occurs while my RT program loops.

-- 
Serge Noiraud

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
  2006-02-23 13:01   ` Serge Noiraud
@ 2006-02-23 12:55     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2006-02-23 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Serge Noiraud; +Cc: linux-kernel


* Serge Noiraud <serge.noiraud@bull.net> wrote:

> jeudi 23 Février 2006 13:47, Ingo Molnar wrote/a écrit :
> > 
> > * Serge Noiraud <serge.noiraud@bull.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > These messages occurs while my RT program loops.
> > 
> > what priority does your RT program have?
> I tried  with 10, 30, 50 and 99.

ok - the softlockup detector in -rt is a bit messy. I have written a 
more robust softlockup detector for upstream (it's now in -mm), i'll try 
to put that into the next -rt kernel. Turn it off for now ...

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1!
  2006-02-23 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2006-02-23 13:01   ` Serge Noiraud
  2006-02-23 12:55     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Serge Noiraud @ 2006-02-23 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel

jeudi 23 Février 2006 13:47, Ingo Molnar wrote/a écrit :
> 
> * Serge Noiraud <serge.noiraud@bull.net> wrote:
> 
> > These messages occurs while my RT program loops.
> 
> what priority does your RT program have?
I tried  with 10, 30, 50 and 99.
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

-- 
Serge Noiraud

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-23 12:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-23 12:54 RT : 2.6.15-rt17 and possible softlockup detected on CPU#1! Serge Noiraud
2006-02-23 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 13:01   ` Serge Noiraud
2006-02-23 12:55     ` Ingo Molnar

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.