All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thunder7@xs4all.nl
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:09:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FDF82A.5050201@bootc.net>

From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:00:10PM +0000
> Hi all,
> 
> [4295106.474000] raid6: mmxx2     2500 MB/s
> [4295106.521000] raid6: sse1x2    2339 MB/s
> [4295106.524000] raid6: using algorithm sse1x2 (2339 MB/s)
> [4295106.531000] md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
> 
> I just loaded the raid6 module for fun (might end up using it one day), and 
> I was surprised at its choice of algorithm. By the messages above, I would 
> have assumed it would choose the mmxx2 algorithm at 2500 MB/s instead of 
> sse1x2 at the slightly slower 2339 MB/s. This is probably entirely expected 
> behaviour, but why?
> 
Because it is more cache-efficient (allows the other code to run at a
higher speed). This comes up now and again, perhaps these messages
should be rephrased.

Jurriaan
-- 
Uhm, well, what we are talking about in privy terms, is the very latest
in front-wall fresh air orifices combined with a wide capacity gutter
installation below.
You mean crap out of the window?
	Blackadder II
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.16-rc3-mm1 5503 bogomips load load 0.01

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 18:00 MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice? Chris Boot
2006-02-23 21:09 ` thunder7 [this message]
2006-02-23 21:31   ` Chris Boot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere \
    --to=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=bootc@bootc.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.