All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Is this possible?
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:16:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060305091610.GA14731@EIS> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-99477220206399@msgid-missing>

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:43:11PM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> HTB Class structure the implements this:
> 
>   htb class parent 1:   classid 1:10 rate 80% ceil 100%

To my understanding, a root class that has a higher ceil than rate 
can always use bandwidth up to it's ceil. Thus it would be more 
correct to set the rate to 100% here (whatever that is) as well.

>   htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:11 rate 30% ceil 100%
>   htb class parent 1:11 classid 1:19 rate 30% ceil 100% prio 0 [VOIP leaf]

If class 1:19 is the only child of class 1:11, it can always use 
whatever bandwidth the parent class can get. So the parent class 
does not have any limiting factor here and you can just skip it 
and attach 1:19 to 1:10 directly.

>   htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:20 rate 70% ceil  80%
>   htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:21 rate 20% ceil  80% prio 1 [interactive leaf]
>   htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:22 rate 50% ceil  80% prio 2 [other leaf]
> 
> This is the small class tree I can think of that does it.

The only difference to the tree before is that you grouped all non-voip 
traffic under a separate parent class which is capped at 80%, so voip 
always has 20% of available bandwidth which can not be taken away from 
it, right? If that was your intention, then it's fine.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-05  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-10 13:37 [LARTC] Is this possible? GILBERTO BRAZ
2006-02-23  8:38 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-23  9:23 ` Andreas Klauer
2006-02-23 21:27 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-24  3:49 ` gypsy
2006-02-24  5:03 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-24  5:11 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-05  3:43 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-05  9:16 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2006-03-06  0:53 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-06  1:19 ` Andreas Klauer
2006-03-06  3:07 ` Russell Stuart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060305091610.GA14731@EIS \
    --to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.