From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Is this possible?
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:19:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306011956.GA1799@EIS> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-99477220206399@msgid-missing>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:53:13AM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> I can verify it doesn't. I have implemented this in real
> life, and the class is limited to the "rate".
Thanks for pointing it out.
> The revised class structure is now:
>
> htb class parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 80% ceil 100%
> htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:11 rate 100% ceil 100%
> htb class parent 1:11 classid 1:19 rate 30% ceil 100% prio 0 [VOIP leaf]
> htb class parent 1:10 classid 1:20 rate 70% ceil 100%
> htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:21 rate 20% ceil 100% prio 1 [interactive leaf]
> htb class parent 1:20 classid 1:22 rate 50% ceil 100% prio 2 [other leaf]
Interesting analysis, although it kind of defies my HTB logic
(which is just an inaccurate model). If the 1:10 class is
limited to the rate as you said above (which would be 80%),
how can a child class have a rate of 100%?
I still don't understand what to make of a root class with
different rate / ceil settings. It's either limited to rate,
or to ceil all the time; if it isn't, it decides to jump
over it's rate under which circumstances?
Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-10 13:37 [LARTC] Is this possible? GILBERTO BRAZ
2006-02-23 8:38 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-23 9:23 ` Andreas Klauer
2006-02-23 21:27 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-24 3:49 ` gypsy
2006-02-24 5:03 ` Russell Stuart
2006-02-24 5:11 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-05 3:43 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-05 9:16 ` Andreas Klauer
2006-03-06 0:53 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-06 1:19 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2006-03-06 3:07 ` Russell Stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306011956.GA1799@EIS \
--to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.