From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, jblunck@suse.de,
bcrl@linux.intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory barriers and spin_unlock safety
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:40:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060307174057.GD7301@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31420.1141753019@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:36:59PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I suspect, then, that x86_64 should not have an SFENCE for smp_wmb(), and
> > that only io_wmb() should have that.
>
> Hmmm... We don't actually have io_wmb()... Should the following be added to
> all archs?
>
> io_mb()
> io_rmb()
> io_wmb()
it's spelled mmiowb(), and reads from IO space are synchronous, so don't
need barriers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-07 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-03 16:03 Memory barriers and spin_unlock safety David Howells
2006-03-03 16:45 ` David Howells
2006-03-03 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-03 20:17 ` David Howells
2006-03-03 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-03 21:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-03 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-03 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 17:36 ` David Howells
2006-03-07 17:40 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-03-07 17:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-03-07 18:18 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 18:55 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-07 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 9:06 ` Helge Hafting
2006-03-03 20:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-03 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-03 20:15 ` David Howells
2006-03-03 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-03 21:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-03-03 21:18 ` Hollis Blanchard
2006-03-03 21:52 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-03 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-04 10:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-04 22:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-03-04 10:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-04 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 3:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-08 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 13:12 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-08 15:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-05 2:04 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] <5Ml19-2Ki-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5MlO0-3JU-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5MCF0-2TS-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5MITJ-2l4-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NXxl-6WZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NY0h-7wa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-11 1:19 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-12 18:09 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060307174057.GD7301@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcrl@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.