All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: olel@ans.pl, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, rajesh.shah@intel.com
Subject: Re: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:51:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060313115155.24dfb6f3.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060313113615.A24797@unix-os.sc.intel.com>

Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> wrote:
>
> When CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is turned on we always use physflat mode (bigsmp) even 
>  when #of CPUs are less than 8 to avoid sending IPI to offline processors.
> 
>  Without having BIGSMP on it spits out a warning during boot on systems that
>  seems misleading, since it complains even on systems that have less
>  than 8 cpus.
> 
> ...
>
>  --- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/arch/i386/Kconfig
>  +++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/Kconfig
>  @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ config PHYSICAL_START
>   
>   config HOTPLUG_CPU
>   	bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>  -	depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
>  +	depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER && (X86_GENERICARCH || X86_BIGSMP)
>   	---help---
>   	  Say Y here to experiment with turning CPUs off and on.  CPUs
>   	  can be controlled through /sys/devices/system/cpu.

One of the main reasons for turning on CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU on x86 is
actually for suspend-to-disk on SMP.  I don't think it's desirable to force
all those little machines to use X86_GENERICARCH || X86_BIGSMP.  And it'd
be good to make that warning go away for 2.6.16.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-13 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-12  2:04 More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12  5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 11:04   ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 11:25     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 13:05       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 15:35         ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-03-12 21:13           ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 22:30             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 19:36               ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 19:51                 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-13 20:05                   ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 22:22                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 23:04                       ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-15  5:44                         ` Nathan Lynch
2006-03-15  6:18                           ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-15  7:31                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15  9:37                               ` [PATCH] No need to protect current->group_info in sys_getgroups(), in_group_p() and in_egroup_p() Eric Dumazet
2006-03-20 19:09                                 ` [PATCH] Use unsigned int types for a faster bsearch Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  5:06                                   ` [PATCH] Use __read_mostly on some hot fs variables Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  5:15                                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22  6:23                                     ` [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  6:41                                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-22  6:59                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  7:03                                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 18:09                               ` More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Ashok Raj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-15 10:50 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-15 15:44 ` Krzysztof Oledzki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060313115155.24dfb6f3.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olel@ans.pl \
    --cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.