From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:23:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4420ED66.5060703@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4420DB55.60803@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]
Goal : Avoid some locking/unlocking 'struct files_struct'->file_lock for mono
threaded processes.
We define files_multithreaded() function .
static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
{
return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
}
On plain UP kernel (not preemptable nor spinlock debug), this function is a
const 0, so that gcc can wipe out some code.
On preemptible or SMP, or spinlock debug kernels, the result is true only if
the ref count is greater than 1 (multi threaded process or /proc/{pid}/fd is
under investigation by another task)
This patch increases kernel size but pros are worth the cons, as said Linus
himself, we should increase performance of mono-threaded tasks....
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #2: files_multithreaded.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]
--- a/include/linux/file.h 2006-03-22 06:23:02.000000000 +0100
+++ b/include/linux/file.h 2006-03-22 07:11:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
spinlock_t file_lock; /* Protects concurrent writers. Nests inside tsk->alloc_lock */
};
+static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
+{
+ return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
+}
+
#define files_fdtable(files) (rcu_dereference((files)->fdt))
extern void FASTCALL(__fput(struct file *));
--- a/fs/open.c.orig 2006-03-22 06:24:34.000000000 +0100
+++ b/fs/open.c 2006-03-22 06:30:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1050,11 +1050,17 @@
{
struct files_struct *files = current->files;
struct fdtable *fdt;
- spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ int fl_locked = 0;
+
+ if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+ spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ fl_locked = 1;
+ }
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
- spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ if (fl_locked)
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fd_install);
@@ -1147,8 +1153,12 @@
struct file * filp;
struct files_struct *files = current->files;
struct fdtable *fdt;
+ int fl_locked = 0;
- spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+ spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ fl_locked = 1;
+ }
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
if (fd >= fdt->max_fds)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -1158,11 +1168,13 @@
rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
FD_CLR(fd, fdt->close_on_exec);
__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
- spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ if (fl_locked)
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
return filp_close(filp, files);
out_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ if (fl_locked)
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
return -EBADF;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-12 2:04 More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 11:04 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 11:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 13:05 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 15:35 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-03-12 21:13 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 19:36 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 20:05 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 23:04 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-15 5:44 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-03-15 6:18 ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-15 7:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 9:37 ` [PATCH] No need to protect current->group_info in sys_getgroups(), in_group_p() and in_egroup_p() Eric Dumazet
2006-03-20 19:09 ` [PATCH] Use unsigned int types for a faster bsearch Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:06 ` [PATCH] Use __read_mostly on some hot fs variables Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:15 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22 6:23 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-03-22 6:41 ` [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes Andrew Morton
2006-03-22 6:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 7:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 18:09 ` More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4420ED66.5060703@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.