* [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes)
[not found] ` <20060308073743.GA31959@colo.lackof.org>
@ 2006-03-12 13:26 ` Helge Deller
2006-03-13 20:34 ` Grant Grundler
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Helge Deller @ 2006-03-12 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: parisc-linux
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 08:37, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:27:37PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Attached is the patch.
> > I still think we should try to get real ioremapping working.
> > I'm no Linux-Kernel-memory-expert, but my plan was to read about it and learn.
> > Currently, if I enable CONFIG_HPPA_IOREMAP the 64bit kernel crashes
> > in sba_iommu.c: sba_driver_callback() after the first ioremap().
> > Maybe others here want to try as well ?
>
> Yes, I have. It crashed in exactly the same location.
> But I don't understand the VM magic needed to make this work either.
I did some more testing and analysis on this problem.
(I even for the first time did some reading on Linux kernel memory management to understand all that pgd, pmd, pte stuff :-))
Here is my current analysis.
Maybe someone with a better understanding might have some idea on what's going on ?
drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c does the following on my machine:
void __iomem *sba_addr;
sba_addr = ioremap(0xfffffffffed00000, 4096); /* 0xfffffffffed00000 is hpa of Astro BC Runway Port at 0xfffffffffed00000 [10] */
func_class = * (volatile unsigned long long *) (sba_addr + 8);
Here is the important part of the bootlog:
Linux version 2.6.16-rc5-pa2 (root@p100) (gcc version 3.4.3) #21 Sun Mar 12 13:43:30 CET 2006
FP[0] enabled: Rev 1 Model 19
The 64-bit Kernel has started...
Found devices:
1. Astro BC Runway Port at 0xfffffffffed00000 [10] { 12, 0x0, 0x582, 0x0000b }
2. Elroy PCI Bridge at 0xfffffffffed30000 [10/0] { 13, 0x0, 0x782, 0x0000a }
3. Elroy PCI Bridge at 0xfffffffffed32000 [10/1] { 13, 0x0, 0x782, 0x0000a }
4. Elroy PCI Bridge at 0xfffffffffed38000 [10/4] { 13, 0x0, 0x782, 0x0000a }
5. Elroy PCI Bridge at 0xfffffffffed3c000 [10/6] { 13, 0x0, 0x782, 0x0000a }
6. Allegro W2 at 0xfffffffffffa0000 [32] { 0, 0x0, 0x5dc, 0x00004 }
7. Memory at 0xfffffffffed10200 [49] { 1, 0x0, 0x09c, 0x00009 }
CPU(s): 1 x PA8700 (PCX-W2) at 750.000000 MHz
Setting cache flush threshold to 3ba6c0 (1 CPUs online)
hpa start = fffffffffed00000 size=4096 <<<<<< this is the Astro BC
IOREMAP: phys_addr=fffffffffed00000, offset = 0, size=4096
IOREMAP: addr = 0000000000008000 <<<<< the new vm area ( fffffffffed00000(phys) will be mapped to 0x8000(virt))
set_pte: virtual:8000 -> phys=fffffffffed00000, pte=fffffffffed00283 << here is the pte entry which ioremap() generates.
The pte value seems right, and the __pgprot flags which I used were: _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_NO_CACHE;
So, in my opinion, ioremap() does technically the right thing.
Nevertheless, when reading the quadword from (virt) 0x8000+8 it crashes ("A Data Miss Timeout"? - see HPMC log).
Below is the PIM HPMC output.
Looking at the log, it seems that the pte was (mostly?) right, since
the System Responder Address below is 0xfffffffffed10200.
Although I don't understand why it was 0xfffffffffed10200 and not 0xfffffffffed00008 ?
Any ideas ?
Helge
----------------- Processor 0 HPMC Information ------------------
Timestamp =
Sun Mar 12 13:12:54 GMT 2006 (20:06:03:12:13:12:54)
HPMC Chassis Codes = 2cbf0 2500b 2cbf4 2cbfc
General Registers 0 - 31
00-03 0000000000000000 0000000010604920 000000001027a738 000000008fc4a400
04-07 0000000010601920 0000000010576690 0000000000008000 00000000105766b8
08-11 0000000010673380 0000000000000000 000f41fa3d8dea40 00000000105673a8
12-15 000000003b9aca00 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 00000000f0400004
16-19 000000008fc4a400 00000000f000017c 00000000f0000174 0000000010567b50
20-23 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 000000000000093c 000000000067123c
24-27 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000001 0000000010567b50 0000000010601920
28-31 0000000000000018 000000008fc24b30 000000008fc24890 0000000000000060
Control Registers 0 - 31
00-03 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
04-07 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
08-11 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000000000c0 0000000000000024
12-15 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000103000 8000000000000000
16-19 00000009653d8c30 0000000000000000 000000001027a738 000000000cd010d3
20-23 000000000035fffb 0000000040008008 000000000804000f 8000000000000000
24-27 000000000055d000 000000000055d000 00000000ffffffff 00000000ffffffff
28-31 00000000ffffffff 00000000ffffffff 000000008fc24000 00000000105b4000
Space Registers 0 - 7
00-03 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
04-07 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
IIA Space = 0x0000000000000000
IIA Offset = 0x000000001027a73c
Check Type = 0x20000000
CPU State = 0x9e000004
Cache Check = 0x00000000
TLB Check = 0x00000000
Bus Check = 0x003010bb
Assists Check = 0x00000000
Assist State = 0x00000000
Path Info = 0x00031800
System Responder Address = 0xfffffffffed10200
System Requestor Address = 0xfffffffffffa0000
'9000/785 B,C,J Workstation Unarchitected (per-CPU)', rev 1, 140 bytes:
Check Summary = 0xcb81041000000000
Available Memory = 0x0000000080000000
CPU Diagnose Register 2 = 0x0301000000802004
CPU Status Register 0 = 0x2020c20000000000
CPU Status Register 1 = 0x8080000000000000
SADD LOG = 0x2b0a10000fc212c1
Read Short LOG = 0xc18040fffee003fd
ERROR_STATUS = 0x0000000000000010
MEM_ADDR = 0x000001ff3fffffff
MEM_SYND = 0x0000000000000000
MEM_ADDR_CORR = 0x000001ff3fffffff
MEM_SYND_CORR = 0x0000000000000000
RUN_DATA_HIGH = 0xc1bff0fffed08040
RUN_DATA_LOW = 0xc1bff0fffed08040
RUN_CTRL = 0x0000021c00002a1c
RUN_ADDR = 0xc1bff0fffed08040
System Responder Path = 0x00ffffffffffffff
HPMC PIM Analysis Information:
Timestamp =
Sun Mar 12 13:12:54 GMT 2006 (20:06:03:12:13:12:54)
'9000/785 B,C,J Workstation HPMC PIM Analysis (per-CPU)', rev 0, 1304 bytes:
A Data Miss Timeout occurred while CPU 0 was
requesting information.
Memory/IO Controller Error Analysis Information:
The Memory/IO Controller only observed the Broadcast Error. It did not log
any additional information about the HPMC.
Memory Error Log Information:
Timestamp =
Sun Mar 12 13:12:54 GMT 2006 (20:06:03:12:13:12:54)
'9000/785 B,C,J Workstation Memory Error Log', rev 0, 64 bytes:
No memory errors logged
I/O Module Error Log Information:
Timestamp =
Sun Mar 12 13:12:54 GMT 2006 (20:06:03:12:13:12:54)
'9000/785 B,C,J Workstation IO Error Log', rev 0, 228 bytes:
Rope Word1 Word2 Word3
------ ------------ ------------
0 0x00000000 0x0e0cc009 0x00000000fed30048
1 0x00000000 0x1e0cc009 0x00000000fed32048
2 ---------- 0x2e0cc009 ------------------
3 ---------- 0x3e0cc009 ------------------
4 0x00000000 0x4e0cc009 0x00000000fed38048
5 ---------- 0x5e0cc009 ------------------
6 0x00000000 0x6e0cc009 0x00000000fed3c048
7 ---------- 0x7e0cc009 ------------------
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes)
2006-03-12 13:26 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Helge Deller
@ 2006-03-13 20:34 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-15 7:20 ` [parisc-linux] ioremap-changes Grant Grundler
2006-03-17 17:27 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Grant Grundler
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2006-03-13 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Helge Deller; +Cc: parisc-linux
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:26:16PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Here is my current analysis.
> Maybe someone with a better understanding might have some idea on what's going on ?
Yes - I'll take another look. You have good data below:
> 1. Astro BC Runway Port at 0xfffffffffed00000 [10] { 12, 0x0, 0x582, 0x0000b }
...
> hpa start = fffffffffed00000 size=4096 <<<<<< this is the Astro BC
> IOREMAP: phys_addr=fffffffffed00000, offset = 0, size=4096
I think we ahould be doing an ioremap of HPA + ASTRO_IOC_OFFSET.
ie 32*4k (0x20000)
> IOREMAP: addr = 0000000000008000 <<<<< the new vm area ( fffffffffed00000(phys) will be mapped to 0x8000(virt))
> set_pte: virtual:8000 -> phys=fffffffffed00000, pte=fffffffffed00283 << here is the pte entry which ioremap() generates.
...
> Below is the PIM HPMC output.
> Looking at the log, it seems that the pte was (mostly?) right, since
> the System Responder Address below is 0xfffffffffed10200.
> Although I don't understand why it was 0xfffffffffed10200 and not 0xfffffffffed00008 ?
We need to map the BC port to get rev info and we do that
at the top of sba_driver_callback(). So I _think_ the first
accesses are working.
Later, sba_ioc_init() calls
sba_dev->ioc[0].ioc_hpa = ioc_remap(sba_dev, ASTRO_IOC_OFFSET);
That looks fine too.
I just wonder why we are accessing 0xfffffffffed10200 (ioc? + ROPE0_CTL)
instead of (BC HPA + 32 * SBA_FUNC_SIZE):
0xfffffffffed00000 + 32 * 4K = 0xfffffffffed20000
Maybe the offset isn't being placed into the page table correctly.
(Unlikely...)
> Any ideas ?
I'll keep looking more later today and/or tomorrow.
I want to review the HPMC data again too.
thanks,
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] ioremap-changes
2006-03-12 13:26 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Helge Deller
2006-03-13 20:34 ` Grant Grundler
@ 2006-03-15 7:20 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-17 17:27 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Grant Grundler
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2006-03-15 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Helge Deller; +Cc: parisc-linux
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:26:16PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> drivers/parisc/sba_iommu.c does the following on my machine:
> void __iomem *sba_addr;
> sba_addr = ioremap(0xfffffffffed00000, 4096); /* 0xfffffffffed00000 is hpa of Astro BC Runway Port at 0xfffffffffed00000 [10] */
> func_class = * (volatile unsigned long long *) (sba_addr + 8);
>
> Here is the important part of the bootlog:
....
> hpa start = fffffffffed00000 size=4096 <<<<<< this is the Astro BC
> IOREMAP: phys_addr=fffffffffed00000, offset = 0, size=4096
> IOREMAP: addr = 0000000000008000 <<<<< the new vm area ( fffffffffed00000(phys) will be mapped to 0x8000(virt))
> set_pte: virtual:8000 -> phys=fffffffffed00000, pte=fffffffffed00283 << here is the pte entry which ioremap() generates.
>
> The pte value seems right, and the __pgprot flags which I used were: _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_NO_CACHE;
Is the U-bit getting set in the CPU pdir?
It doesn't look like it.
In theory this shouldn't matter since the address falls in "F-space".
IIRC all parisc CPUs treat "F-space" as uncached.
> Nevertheless, when reading the quadword from (virt) 0x8000+8 it crashes
> ("A Data Miss Timeout"? - see HPMC log).
...
> Looking at the log, it seems that the pte was (mostly?) right, since
> the System Responder Address below is 0xfffffffffed10200.
> Although I don't understand why it was 0xfffffffffed10200
> and not 0xfffffffffed00008 ?
I don't understand that either. ffed10200 is the "MEM_CONTROL_0"
register and has nothing to do with the IOC or base SBA function.
But google is my friend:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/hp/2001-q2/0037.html
This suggests whatever address that was accessed was expected to be
handled by the memory controller. So I wonder if the pte is really correct.
Looking at use of _PAGE_NO_CACHE_BIT in arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S,
I'm skeptical we need to set U-bit for any 1.1 TLB handlers:
.macro make_insert_tlb_11 spc,pte,prot
zdep \spc,30,15,\prot
dep \pte,8,7,\prot
extru,= \pte,_PAGE_NO_CACHE_BIT,1,%r0
depi 1,12,1,\prot
...
AFAIK, all the PA 1.1 CPUs hard code F-space to be uncached,
do not support U-bit, and do not support IO outside of F-space.
Am I missing something?
I suggest this in case we can make our TLB handlers another cycle
(or two) faster. This matters on workloads the use > ~200 pages of RAM.
Suprisingly, I didn't see any reference to _PAGE_NO_CACHE_BIT in
make_insert_tlb macro. I have to wonder if the combination of
IOREMAP and setting U-bit would solve the PA8800 cache issues.
depd \pte,8,7,\prot
moves the right-most 7 bits to pos 8 in \prot.
_PAGE_NO_CACHE_BIT is the 8th bit from the right.
Consider adding two lines of code currently in the make_insert_tlb_11
macro to make_insert_tlb:
extru,= \pte,_PAGE_NO_CACHE_BIT,1,%r0
depi 1,12,1,\prot
But like I said near the top, U-bit may not matter for Astro machines.
Astro has all IO in F-space.
It will matter for Stretch (N-class), ZX1 (e.g. rp3440), and SX1000
(rp8420) platforms which have IO from 2GB to 4GB in the physical
address space.
And I think "f_extend" macro is wrong for stretch and ZX1 platforms.
Those platforms are 64-bit only. While the comment says f_extend is
for ILP32 PA2.0 only, any objections if I add "ifndef 64BIT/else/endif"
code to not do anything for the 64-bit builds?
thanks,
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes)
2006-03-12 13:26 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Helge Deller
2006-03-13 20:34 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-15 7:20 ` [parisc-linux] ioremap-changes Grant Grundler
@ 2006-03-17 17:27 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-21 23:09 ` Helge Deller
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant Grundler @ 2006-03-17 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Helge Deller; +Cc: parisc-linux
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:26:16PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Here is the important part of the bootlog:
...
> hpa start = fffffffffed00000 size=4096 <<<<<< this is the Astro BC
> IOREMAP: phys_addr=fffffffffed00000, offset = 0, size=4096
> IOREMAP: addr = 0000000000008000 <<<<< the new vm area ( fffffffffed00000(phys) will be mapped to 0x8000(virt))
> set_pte: virtual:8000 -> phys=fffffffffed00000, pte=fffffffffed00283
I'm wondering if we want all 64 bits set in the pte or if we only want
to set the lower 40 (or 44 for pa8800) bits. The Astro system map
only shows 40-bits.
The "f_extend" might not be needed for Astro chipset if the HW will
automatically alias the 32-bit address range for us. The address
map doesn't indicate 4GB-256MB is aliased. But I wonder how the
32-bit OS could otherwise work - unless PA20 CPU is silently
sign extending everything for us.
Hrm...suggests that maybe we are doing something wrong in the
asm for the 64-bit case.
> Nevertheless, when reading the quadword from (virt) 0x8000+8 it crashes
> ("A Data Miss Timeout"? - see HPMC log).
> Although I don't understand why it was 0xfffffffffed10200 and not 0xfffffffffed00008 ?
As noted before, this is a quirk in the firmware - fed10200 is the memory
controller.
> ----------------- Processor 0 HPMC Information ------------------
...
> MEM_ADDR = 0x000001ff3fffffff
~0UL means not valid.
> RUN_ADDR = 0xc1bff0fffed08040
This was the last Runway address seen on the bus.
Ditto for RUN_DATA_HIGH/LOW.
Unfortunately, fffed08040 is the address of RUN_ADDR register.
It suggests the memory controller never saw an error
and continued recording until HPMC code reads RUN_ADDR.
hth,
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes)
2006-03-17 17:27 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Grant Grundler
@ 2006-03-21 23:09 ` Helge Deller
2006-03-22 3:52 ` Kyle McMartin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Helge Deller @ 2006-03-21 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Grundler; +Cc: parisc-linux
Hi all,
it turned out, that it was a stupid bug in the PFN calculation of the DTLB handler routine.
It's fixed now in CVS.
The 64bit Kernel boots now, but I still have to clean up STIfb driver to do the right thing.
Anyway, nice to have this fixed.
If STIfb is done, it's time to remove the CONFIG_HPPA_IOREMAP option.
Helge
On Friday 17 March 2006 18:27, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:26:16PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Here is the important part of the bootlog:
> ...
> > hpa start = fffffffffed00000 size=4096 <<<<<< this is the Astro BC
> > IOREMAP: phys_addr=fffffffffed00000, offset = 0, size=4096
> > IOREMAP: addr = 0000000000008000 <<<<< the new vm area ( fffffffffed00000(phys) will be mapped to 0x8000(virt))
> > set_pte: virtual:8000 -> phys=fffffffffed00000, pte=fffffffffed00283
>
> I'm wondering if we want all 64 bits set in the pte or if we only want
> to set the lower 40 (or 44 for pa8800) bits. The Astro system map
> only shows 40-bits.
>
> The "f_extend" might not be needed for Astro chipset if the HW will
> automatically alias the 32-bit address range for us. The address
> map doesn't indicate 4GB-256MB is aliased. But I wonder how the
> 32-bit OS could otherwise work - unless PA20 CPU is silently
> sign extending everything for us.
>
> Hrm...suggests that maybe we are doing something wrong in the
> asm for the 64-bit case.
>
> > Nevertheless, when reading the quadword from (virt) 0x8000+8 it crashes
> > ("A Data Miss Timeout"? - see HPMC log).
>
> > Although I don't understand why it was 0xfffffffffed10200 and not 0xfffffffffed00008 ?
>
> As noted before, this is a quirk in the firmware - fed10200 is the memory
> controller.
>
> > ----------------- Processor 0 HPMC Information ------------------
> ...
> > MEM_ADDR = 0x000001ff3fffffff
>
> ~0UL means not valid.
>
> > RUN_ADDR = 0xc1bff0fffed08040
>
> This was the last Runway address seen on the bus.
> Ditto for RUN_DATA_HIGH/LOW.
>
> Unfortunately, fffed08040 is the address of RUN_ADDR register.
> It suggests the memory controller never saw an error
> and continued recording until HPMC code reads RUN_ADDR.
>
> hth,
> grant
>
>
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes)
2006-03-21 23:09 ` Helge Deller
@ 2006-03-22 3:52 ` Kyle McMartin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyle McMartin @ 2006-03-22 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Helge Deller; +Cc: Grant Grundler, parisc-linux
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:09:43AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> it turned out, that it was a stupid bug in the PFN calculation of the DTLB handler routine.
> It's fixed now in CVS.
> The 64bit Kernel boots now, but I still have to clean up STIfb driver to do the right thing.
>
Wow, way to go!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-22 3:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20060307211213.3A261494013@palinux.hppa>
[not found] ` <200603072227.38097.deller@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <20060308073743.GA31959@colo.lackof.org>
2006-03-12 13:26 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Helge Deller
2006-03-13 20:34 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-15 7:20 ` [parisc-linux] ioremap-changes Grant Grundler
2006-03-17 17:27 ` [parisc-linux] Re: linux-2.6 deller (ioremap-changes) Grant Grundler
2006-03-21 23:09 ` Helge Deller
2006-03-22 3:52 ` Kyle McMartin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.