* [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6?
@ 2006-03-16 19:15 Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:29 ` Greg KH
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2006-03-16 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Has anyone ported the i2c-virtual code over 2.6?
- kumar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6?
2006-03-16 19:15 [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6? Kumar Gala
@ 2006-03-16 23:29 ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:39 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:47 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2006-03-16 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:15:47PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Has anyone ported the i2c-virtual code over 2.6?
Not that I know of.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6?
2006-03-16 19:15 [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6? Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:29 ` Greg KH
@ 2006-03-16 23:39 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:47 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2006-03-16 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:15:47PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Has anyone ported the i2c-virtual code over 2.6?
>
> Not that I know of.
thanks. I'll look at porting it 2.6. It seems that the adapter-
>bus_lock is going to be the biggest issue. How evil is it to call
adapter->algo->master_xfer directly instead of i2c_transfer?
- kumar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6?
2006-03-16 19:15 [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6? Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:29 ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:39 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2006-03-16 23:47 ` Greg KH
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2006-03-16 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 05:39:06PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:15:47PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>Has anyone ported the i2c-virtual code over 2.6?
> >
> >Not that I know of.
>
> thanks. I'll look at porting it 2.6. It seems that the adapter-
> >bus_lock is going to be the biggest issue. How evil is it to call
> adapter->algo->master_xfer directly instead of i2c_transfer?
I don't know, Jean?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-16 23:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-16 19:15 [lm-sensors] i2c-virtual in 2.6? Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:29 ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:39 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-16 23:47 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.