From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, kernel-stuff@comcast.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:04:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060319150450.3befd2e1.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603191429580.3826@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> Here's another uninlining patch if you want it.
>
Yes, the bitops need that.
We have a 50-patch series against the bitops code queued up. It's from
Akinobu Mita. It consolidates of all the C-coded operations which
archtectures are presently duplicating. In toto:
80 files changed, 1271 insertions(+), 4999 deletions(-)
It does include uninlining of the hweight functions, although I note that
include/asm-generic/bitops/__ffs.h remains inlined. I don't know how many
architectures are using the generic code though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-19 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-18 20:25 OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative Parag Warudkar
2006-03-18 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 22:09 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-18 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 22:26 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 2:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 5:08 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-19 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:40 ` Al Viro
2006-03-19 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 23:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-19 20:57 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-20 6:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-20 6:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-20 7:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-21 6:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-20 8:22 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-03-19 6:34 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 12:00 ` Alexander Clouter
2006-03-19 14:06 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 17:34 ` Alexander Clouter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060319150450.3befd2e1.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.