From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kernel-stuff@comcast.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:40:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060319194004.GZ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603191125220.3826@g5.osdl.org>
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Doing a "break" inside a conditional by using the gcc statement
> expressions is sublime.
>
> And it works.
In the version of gcc you've tested. With options and phase of moon
being what they had been. IOW, you are awfully optimistic - it's not
just using gcc extension, it's using undocumented (in the best case)
behaviour outside the intended use of that extension.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-19 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-18 20:25 OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative Parag Warudkar
2006-03-18 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 22:09 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-18 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-18 22:26 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 2:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 5:08 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-19 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 19:40 ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-03-19 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-19 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-19 20:57 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-20 6:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-20 6:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-20 7:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-21 6:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-20 8:22 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-03-19 6:34 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 12:00 ` Alexander Clouter
2006-03-19 14:06 ` Parag Warudkar
2006-03-19 17:34 ` Alexander Clouter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060319194004.GZ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.