All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] usb.h: reduce syslog clutter
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:41:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060320194109.GA16890@suse.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1500 bytes --]

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:53:26PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> The current versions of the err() / info() / warn() message macros in
> include/linux/usb.h insert __FILE__ at the beginning of the message.
> When those macros where introduced, back in 2.2 times, that expanded
> to the name of the source file, which was fine.
> 
> However, with the build process changes in 2.5, __FILE__ now expands
> to the complete path name of the source file within the kernel tree.
> Consequently, that part of the kernel message now takes up about half
> of an 80 character screen line.
> 
> The following patch modifies these macros so that, when used in a
> module, they'll insert the module name instead, which is significantly
> shorter and also tends to be more useful to users (as opposed to kernel
> developers) trying to make sense of a particular message.
> 
> It also adds a macro for the "notice" message level which was missing
> so far.
> 
> The triple checks for defined(CONFIG_MODULES), defined(THIS_MODULE)
> and THIS_MODULE are necessary to catch all possible combinations of
> - kernel being built with or without module support
> - source file #including linux/usb.h or not
> - source file actually being built as a module or not

What was wrong with my suggestion that we simply delete these macros and
convert the USB code over to using the proper dev_info(), dev_warn(),
dev_err(), and dev_notice() macros instead?

These really should not be propagated any further.

thanks,

greg k-h

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-20 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-20 19:41 Greg KH [this message]
2006-03-20 20:00 ` [KJ] Re: [PATCH] usb.h: reduce syslog clutter Tilman Schmidt
2006-03-20 20:39 ` Greg KH
2006-03-21  0:56 ` Tilman Schmidt
2006-03-22 20:56 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060320194109.GA16890@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.