From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: cpu scheduler merge plans
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:51:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060322155122.2745649f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
So it's that time again. We need to decide which of the queued sched
patches should be merged into 2.6.17.
I have:
sched-fix-task-interactivity-calculation.patch
small-schedule-microoptimization.patch
#
sched-implement-smpnice.patch
sched-smpnice-apply-review-suggestions.patch
sched-smpnice-fix-average-load-per-run-queue-calculations.patch
sched-store-weighted-load-on-up.patch
sched-add-discrete-weighted-cpu-load-function.patch
sched-add-above-background-load-function.patch
# Suresh had problems
# con:
sched-cleanup_task_activated.patch
sched-make_task_noninteractive_use_sleep_type.patch
sched-dont_decrease_idle_sleep_avg.patch
sched-include_noninteractive_sleep_in_idle_detect.patch
sched-remove-on-runqueue-requeueing.patch
sched-activate-sched-batch-expired.patch
sched-reduce-overhead-of-calc_load.patch
#
sched-fix-interactive-task-starvation.patch
#
# "strange load balancing problems": pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch
sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch
x86-dont-use-cpuid2-to-determine-cache-info-if-cpuid4-is-supported.patch
I'm not sure what the "Suresh had problems" comment refers to - perhaps a
now-removed patch.
afaik, the load balancing problem which Peter observed remains unresolved.
Has smpnice had appropriate testing for regressions?
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 23:51 Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-22 22:57 ` cpu scheduler merge plans kernel
2006-03-23 1:37 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-23 22:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-23 0:31 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-23 1:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-24 23:45 ` more smpnice patch issues Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-25 0:56 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-25 1:53 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-25 3:40 ` [PATCH] sched: make sure busiest group and run queue are pullable Peter Williams
2006-03-26 23:24 ` more smpnice patch issues Peter Williams
2006-03-26 23:43 ` [PATCH] sched: smpnice prevent integer arithmetic wrap problems Peter Williams
2006-03-23 5:03 ` cpu scheduler merge plans Ingo Molnar
2006-03-23 5:13 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060322155122.2745649f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.