From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpu scheduler merge plans
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:06:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44231BCE.4030006@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060322173754.A19085@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:57:06AM +1100, kernel@kolivas.org wrote:
>
>>Quoting Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>:
>>
>>>#
>>># "strange load balancing problems": pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
>>>sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch
>>>sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch
>>>x86-dont-use-cpuid2-to-determine-cache-info-if-cpuid4-is-supported.patch
>
>
> I'd like to see the three above patches in 2.6.17. Peters "strange load
> balancing problems" seems to be a false alarm(this patch will have
> minimal impact on a single core cpu because of domain degeneration..) and
> doesn't happen on recent -mm kernels..
I agree. This is no longer a problem and certainly shouldn't prevent
the above patches going in to 2.6.17.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-23 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 23:51 cpu scheduler merge plans Andrew Morton
2006-03-22 22:57 ` kernel
2006-03-23 1:37 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-23 22:06 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-03-23 0:31 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-23 1:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-24 23:45 ` more smpnice patch issues Siddha, Suresh B
2006-03-25 0:56 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-25 1:53 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-25 3:40 ` [PATCH] sched: make sure busiest group and run queue are pullable Peter Williams
2006-03-26 23:24 ` more smpnice patch issues Peter Williams
2006-03-26 23:43 ` [PATCH] sched: smpnice prevent integer arithmetic wrap problems Peter Williams
2006-03-23 5:03 ` cpu scheduler merge plans Ingo Molnar
2006-03-23 5:13 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44231BCE.4030006@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.