From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
Dan Arai <arai@vmware.com>, Anne Holler <anne@vmware.com>,
Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>,
Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@ira.uka.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Rik Van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@vmware.com>,
Jack Lo <jlo@vmware.com>, Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Leendert van Doorn <leendert@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:38:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603222338.44919.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4421D379.3090405@vmware.com>
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 23:45, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> I propose an entirely different approach - use segmentation.
That would require a lot of changes to save/restore the segmentation
register at kernel entry/exit since there is no swapgs on i386.
And will be likely slower there too and also even slow down the
VMI-kernel-no-hypervisor.
Still might be the best option.
How did that rumoured Xenolinux-over-VMI implementation solve that problem?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 17:59 [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 22:49 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-14 0:00 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14 21:27 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-14 22:29 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-15 2:57 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-15 5:44 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-15 22:56 ` Daniel Arai
2006-03-16 1:16 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-16 3:40 ` Eli Collins
2006-03-16 3:40 ` Eli Collins
2006-03-14 4:11 ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-22 20:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-22 21:34 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-22 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-22 21:57 ` Chris Wright
2006-03-23 0:06 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 21:39 ` [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation II Andi Kleen
2006-03-22 22:43 ` Daniel Arai
2006-03-22 22:45 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 22:38 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-03-22 23:54 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 23:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-22 22:04 ` [RFC, PATCH 1/24] i386 Vmi documentation Zachary Amsden
2006-03-22 21:58 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603222338.44919.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anne@vmware.com \
--cc=arai@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jlo@vmware.com \
--cc=jreddy@vmware.com \
--cc=jtl@ira.uka.de \
--cc=kmacy@fsmware.com \
--cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
--cc=leendert@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pratap@vmware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.