All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: [uml-devel] [PATCH 8/16] UML - More carefully test whether we are in a system call
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:14:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603241814.k2OIElnT005535@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)

From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
 
For security reasons, UML in is_syscall() needs to have access to code
in vsyscall-page. The current implementation grants this access by
explicitly allowing access to vsyscall in access_ok_skas(). With this
change, copy_from_user() may be used to read the code.
Ptrace access to vsyscall-page for debugging already was implemented
in get_user_pages() by mainline.
In i386, copy_from_user can't access vsyscall-page, but returns EFAULT.
 
To make UML behave as i386 does, I changed is_syscall to use
access_process_vm(current) to read the code from vsyscall-page.
This doesn't hurt security, but simplifies the code and prepares
implementation of stub-vmas.

Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>

Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:17:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/config.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include "linux/sched.h"
+#include "linux/mm.h"
 #include "asm/elf.h"
 #include "asm/ptrace.h"
 #include "asm/uaccess.h"
@@ -26,9 +27,17 @@ int is_syscall(unsigned long addr)
 
 	n = copy_from_user(&instr, (void __user *) addr, sizeof(instr));
 	if(n){
-		printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from 0x%lx\n",
-		       addr);
-		return(0);
+		/* access_process_vm() grants access to vsyscall and stub,
+		 * while copy_from_user doesn't. Maybe access_process_vm is
+		 * slow, but that doesn't matter, since it will be called only
+		 * in case of singlestepping, if copy_from_user failed.
+		 */
+		n = access_process_vm(current, addr, &instr, sizeof(instr), 0);
+		if(n != sizeof(instr)) {
+			printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from "
+			       "0x%lx\n", addr);
+			return(1);
+		}
 	}
 	/* int 0x80 or sysenter */
 	return((instr == 0x80cd) || (instr == 0x340f));
Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:50:15.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:50:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/elf.h>
 
@@ -136,9 +137,28 @@ void arch_switch(void)
 */
 }
 
+/* XXX Mostly copied from sys-i386 */
 int is_syscall(unsigned long addr)
 {
-	panic("is_syscall");
+	unsigned short instr;
+	int n;
+
+	n = copy_from_user(&instr, (void __user *) addr, sizeof(instr));
+	if(n){
+		/* access_process_vm() grants access to vsyscall and stub,
+		 * while copy_from_user doesn't. Maybe access_process_vm is
+		 * slow, but that doesn't matter, since it will be called only
+		 * in case of singlestepping, if copy_from_user failed.
+		 */
+		n = access_process_vm(current, addr, &instr, sizeof(instr), 0);
+		if(n != sizeof(instr)) {
+			printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from "
+			       "0x%lx\n", addr);
+			return(1);
+		}
+	}
+	/* sysenter */
+	return(instr == 0x050f);
 }
 
 int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *regs, elf_fpregset_t *fpu )



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/16] UML - More carefully test whether we are in a system call
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:14:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603241814.k2OIElnT005535@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)

From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
 
For security reasons, UML in is_syscall() needs to have access to code
in vsyscall-page. The current implementation grants this access by
explicitly allowing access to vsyscall in access_ok_skas(). With this
change, copy_from_user() may be used to read the code.
Ptrace access to vsyscall-page for debugging already was implemented
in get_user_pages() by mainline.
In i386, copy_from_user can't access vsyscall-page, but returns EFAULT.
 
To make UML behave as i386 does, I changed is_syscall to use
access_process_vm(current) to read the code from vsyscall-page.
This doesn't hurt security, but simplifies the code and prepares
implementation of stub-vmas.

Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>

Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:17:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/config.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include "linux/sched.h"
+#include "linux/mm.h"
 #include "asm/elf.h"
 #include "asm/ptrace.h"
 #include "asm/uaccess.h"
@@ -26,9 +27,17 @@ int is_syscall(unsigned long addr)
 
 	n = copy_from_user(&instr, (void __user *) addr, sizeof(instr));
 	if(n){
-		printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from 0x%lx\n",
-		       addr);
-		return(0);
+		/* access_process_vm() grants access to vsyscall and stub,
+		 * while copy_from_user doesn't. Maybe access_process_vm is
+		 * slow, but that doesn't matter, since it will be called only
+		 * in case of singlestepping, if copy_from_user failed.
+		 */
+		n = access_process_vm(current, addr, &instr, sizeof(instr), 0);
+		if(n != sizeof(instr)) {
+			printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from "
+			       "0x%lx\n", addr);
+			return(1);
+		}
 	}
 	/* int 0x80 or sysenter */
 	return((instr == 0x80cd) || (instr == 0x340f));
Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:50:15.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/um/sys-x86_64/ptrace.c	2006-03-23 12:50:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/elf.h>
 
@@ -136,9 +137,28 @@ void arch_switch(void)
 */
 }
 
+/* XXX Mostly copied from sys-i386 */
 int is_syscall(unsigned long addr)
 {
-	panic("is_syscall");
+	unsigned short instr;
+	int n;
+
+	n = copy_from_user(&instr, (void __user *) addr, sizeof(instr));
+	if(n){
+		/* access_process_vm() grants access to vsyscall and stub,
+		 * while copy_from_user doesn't. Maybe access_process_vm is
+		 * slow, but that doesn't matter, since it will be called only
+		 * in case of singlestepping, if copy_from_user failed.
+		 */
+		n = access_process_vm(current, addr, &instr, sizeof(instr), 0);
+		if(n != sizeof(instr)) {
+			printk("is_syscall : failed to read instruction from "
+			       "0x%lx\n", addr);
+			return(1);
+		}
+	}
+	/* sysenter */
+	return(instr == 0x050f);
 }
 
 int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *regs, elf_fpregset_t *fpu )


             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-24 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-24 18:14 Jeff Dike [this message]
2006-03-24 18:14 ` [PATCH 8/16] UML - More carefully test whether we are in a system call Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603241814.k2OIElnT005535@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
    --to=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.