* Maximum number of DomUs? (x86_64)
@ 2006-04-09 1:37 Florian Kirstein
2006-04-09 7:48 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Florian Kirstein @ 2006-04-09 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Hallo,
I just tried to push a quad-opteron server with 16GB of memory to the limit
and I reached it a bit earlier than expected. It seems that no matter
how much memory I assign to each DomU, and wether i use loopback or
phy/lvm devices for the storage, or no vif/storage at all, I can't
crate more than 107 DomUs (yes, that's not a real problem, I'm just
curious :) After No. 107 that I get(*):
Using config file "vm107".
Started domain VM107
Using config file "vm108".
Error: (12, 'Cannot allocate memory')
Using config file "vm109".
Error: (12, 'Cannot allocate memory')
but of course there's still memory left in Domain-0 to balloon out:
Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 9215 4 r----- 319.3
VM1 1 64 1 ------ 0.8
VM10 10 64 1 -b---- 0.7
VM100 100 64 1 -b---- 0.4
When I assign 128MB per DomU exactly the same effect:
Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 2372 4 r----- 2196.3
VM1 129 128 1 -b---- 0.4
VM10 138 128 1 -b---- 0.4
VM100 228 128 1 -b---- 0.2
So I wonder, which structure could run out of memory there? Is this a known
limitation? Didn't find much about the maximum number of DomUs
in the list archives... The Dom0 is running a CentOS4 x86_64 and I don't
even need a DomU image to reach this limit, network and diskless DomUs
just running into an "no root filesystem" panic being "preserve"d after
the crash have the same effect.
(:ul8er, r@y
(*) yes, I know, I could have used a vmid parameter instead of creating
100s of configfiles :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Maximum number of DomUs? (x86_64)
2006-04-09 1:37 Maximum number of DomUs? (x86_64) Florian Kirstein
@ 2006-04-09 7:48 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2006-04-09 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Kirstein; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On 9 Apr 2006, at 02:37, Florian Kirstein wrote:
> So I wonder, which structure could run out of memory there? Is this a
> known
> limitation? Didn't find much about the maximum number of DomUs
> in the list archives... The Dom0 is running a CentOS4 x86_64 and I
> don't
> even need a DomU image to reach this limit, network and diskless DomUs
> just running into an "no root filesystem" panic being "preserve"d after
> the crash have the same effect.
Xen's own private heap is fixed size (16MB) and that's used to allocate
a certain amount of per-domain state. This restriction could be lifted
on x86/64 but it's not particularly a priority right now.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-09 7:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-09 1:37 Maximum number of DomUs? (x86_64) Florian Kirstein
2006-04-09 7:48 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.