From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 09:51:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060501135127.GA1276@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060429014956.GB9734@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:49:56PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:28:46PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Ok, this gives us a definite proposal, which I finally like:
> >
> > * to exclude sys_tee:
> >
> > bitmask = 0;
> > set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> > ptrace(PTRACE_SET_NOTRACE, bitmask);
> >
> > * to trace only sys_tee:
> >
> > bitmask = 0;
> > set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> > ptrace(PTRACE_SET_TRACEONLY, bitmask);
>
> Yup, I like this.
I really recommend you not do this. One (better) suggestion earlier
was:
struct {
int bitmask_length;
int flags;
char bitmask[0];
};
The difference between this case and the sigprocmask example is that
the size of a sigset_t is very hard to change - it's a userspace ABI
break. If you want to model it after sigprocmask, don't look at the
man page, which describes the POSIX function. Look at the more recent
RT version of the syscall instead:
sys_rt_sigprocmask(int how, sigset_t __user *set, sigset_t __user *oset, size_t sigsetsize)
Suppose the kernel knows about 32 more syscalls than userspace. It's
going to read extra bits out of the bitmask that userspace didn't
initialize!
Also, if you store the mask with the child process, it risks surprising
existing tracers: attach, set mask, detach, then the next time someone
attaches an old version of strace some syscalls will be "hidden".
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 09:51:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060501135127.GA1276@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060429014956.GB9734@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:49:56PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:28:46PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Ok, this gives us a definite proposal, which I finally like:
> >
> > * to exclude sys_tee:
> >
> > bitmask = 0;
> > set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> > ptrace(PTRACE_SET_NOTRACE, bitmask);
> >
> > * to trace only sys_tee:
> >
> > bitmask = 0;
> > set_bit(__NR_tee, bitmask);
> > ptrace(PTRACE_SET_TRACEONLY, bitmask);
>
> Yup, I like this.
I really recommend you not do this. One (better) suggestion earlier
was:
struct {
int bitmask_length;
int flags;
char bitmask[0];
};
The difference between this case and the sigprocmask example is that
the size of a sigset_t is very hard to change - it's a userspace ABI
break. If you want to model it after sigprocmask, don't look at the
man page, which describes the POSIX function. Look at the more recent
RT version of the syscall instead:
sys_rt_sigprocmask(int how, sigset_t __user *set, sigset_t __user *oset, size_t sigsetsize)
Suppose the kernel knows about 32 more syscalls than userspace. It's
going to read extra bits out of the bitmask that userspace didn't
initialize!
Also, if you store the mask with the child process, it risks surprising
existing tracers: attach, set mask, detach, then the next time someone
attaches an old version of strace some syscalls will be "hidden".
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-01 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 17:20 [uml-devel] [RFC] PATCH 3/4 - Time virtualization : PTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK Jeff Dike
2006-04-13 17:20 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-18 12:57 ` [uml-devel] " Pavel Machek
2006-04-18 12:57 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-26 18:38 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 18:38 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-20 9:05 ` [uml-devel] " Heiko Carstens
2006-04-20 9:05 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-20 14:17 ` [uml-devel] " Bodo Stroesser
2006-04-20 14:17 ` Bodo Stroesser
2006-04-25 18:32 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-25 18:32 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 20:26 ` Charles P. Wright
2006-04-26 20:26 ` Charles P. Wright
2006-04-26 19:40 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 19:40 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 21:29 ` Charles P. Wright
2006-04-26 21:29 ` Charles P. Wright
2006-04-21 18:16 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-21 18:16 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-21 18:38 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-21 18:38 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-22 7:06 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-22 7:06 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-22 8:32 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-22 8:32 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-25 15:59 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-25 15:59 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-21 18:34 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2006-04-21 18:34 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-25 16:29 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-25 16:29 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 15:47 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-26 15:47 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-26 15:46 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-26 15:46 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-28 20:28 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-28 20:28 ` Blaisorblade
2006-04-29 1:49 ` Jeff Dike
2006-04-29 1:49 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-01 13:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-05-01 13:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-01 13:45 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-01 13:45 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-01 15:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-01 15:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-29 8:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-29 8:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-05-01 17:02 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-01 17:02 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-02 6:57 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-05-02 6:57 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060501135127.GA1276@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.