All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:42:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060510164207.GD27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147279038.21536.120.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:37:18AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 17:21 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > Don't.  Fix.  Correct.  Code.
> > 
> > Ever.  Because sooner or later you will paper over real bug.  It's far better
> > to reject patches that just make $TOOL to STFU than risk blind "fix" hiding
> > a real bug.
> 
> Couldn't agree with you more .. But I don't want to see the warning
> either ..

*shrug*
I hope that raw number of warnings is not used as job performance metrics.
All I can suggest is (a) watch for _changes_ in the warnings between revisions
and (b) get gcc folks fix the warning generation...

> > Unless you show a real codepath that leads to use without initialization
> > (and do that in commit message, so it could be verified as real issue),
> > these patches are worthless in the best case and dangerous in the worst
> > one.
> 
> Several of my patches have nothing to do with initialization .. 

s/codepath.*/bug being fixed/

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-10 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-10  2:56 [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 14:31   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:09     ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:06       ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:24         ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 16:24           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 17:18             ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 17:45               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 18:27                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-05-10 19:07                   ` Serge Belyshev
2006-05-10 20:24                 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:35                   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 20:36                   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:53                     ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:20             ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:49               ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 20:44                 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 21:11                   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:20                     ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 21:33                       ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:39                         ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 21:45                           ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:48                             ` Al Viro
2006-05-11  6:36                       ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 15:39         ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:38           ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:21             ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 16:37               ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:42                 ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-05-10 17:25                   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 19:55                 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-05-10 22:03               ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 22:10                 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 22:31                   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-10 22:45                     ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:05                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 23:20                         ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:45                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-11  1:28                             ` Al Viro
2006-05-11  8:11                               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 10:07                                 ` [PATCH -mm] introduce a false positive macro Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 20:40                             ` [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix Adrian Bunk
2006-05-11 21:14                               ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:06                     ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-10 22:30                 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-11  2:58                   ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060510164207.GD27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.