All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:39:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060510213929.GF27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147296822.21536.175.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:33:42PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Consider the following scenario:
> > 
> > 1) gcc gives false positive
> > 2) tosser on a rampage "fixes" it
> > 3) code is chaged a month later
> > 4) a real bug is introduced - one that would be _really_ visible to gcc,
> > with "is used" in a warning
> > 5) thanks to aforementioned tosser, that bug remains hidden.
> 
> I don't really see anything new here .. The same sort of stuff can
> happen in any code considered for inclusion .. That's what the review
> process is for .
> 
> Real errors can be covered up any number of way ..

One last time: your kind of patches actually increases the odds of new bug
staying unnoticed.

If you really fill the urge to pull a Bunk, do it somewhere else, please -
the real thing is already more than sufficiently annoying.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-10 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-10  2:56 [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 14:31   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:09     ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:06       ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:24         ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 16:24           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 17:18             ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 17:45               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 18:27                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-05-10 19:07                   ` Serge Belyshev
2006-05-10 20:24                 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:35                   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 20:36                   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:53                     ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:20             ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:49               ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 20:44                 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 21:11                   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:20                     ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 21:33                       ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:39                         ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-05-10 21:45                           ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:48                             ` Al Viro
2006-05-11  6:36                       ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 15:39         ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:38           ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:21             ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 16:37               ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:42                 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 17:25                   ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 19:55                 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-05-10 22:03               ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 22:10                 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 22:31                   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-10 22:45                     ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:05                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 23:20                         ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:45                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-11  1:28                             ` Al Viro
2006-05-11  8:11                               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 10:07                                 ` [PATCH -mm] introduce a false positive macro Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 20:40                             ` [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix Adrian Bunk
2006-05-11 21:14                               ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:06                     ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-10 22:30                 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-11  2:58                   ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060510213929.GF27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.