All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:50:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512055025.GA25824@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147401812.1907.14.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>


* john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> -		if (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), irq_affinity[irq])) {
> -			mask = cpumask_of_cpu(any_online_cpu(irq_affinity[irq]));
> -			set_cpus_allowed(current, mask);
> -		}

this is intentional, not a bug. The point of the code above is to ensure 
that every IRQ handler is executed on one CPU. I.e. the irq threads are 
semi-affine - they are strictly affine when executing a handler, but 
they may switch CPUs if the affinity mask points it elsewhere.

but ... we might be able to relax that. Potentially some IRQ handlers 
might assume per-cpu-ness, but that should be uncovered by 
DEBUG_PREEMPT's smp_processor_id() checks.

> +		if(!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> +			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);

> The patch below appears to correct this issue, however it also
> repeatedly(on different irqs) causes the following BUG:

ah. This actually uncovered a real bug. We were calling __do_softirq() 
with interrupts enabled (and being preemptible) - which is certainly 
bad.

this was hidden before because the smp_processor_id() debugging code 
handles tasks bound to a single CPU as per-cpu-safe.

could you check the (totally untested) patch below and see if that fixes 
things for you? I've also added your affinity change.

	Ingo

Index: linux-rt.q/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.q.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ linux-rt.q/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -717,24 +717,21 @@ static int do_irqd(void * __desc)
 	if (param.sched_priority > 25)
 		curr_irq_prio = param.sched_priority - 1;
 
-//	param.sched_priority = 1;
 	sys_sched_setscheduler(current->pid, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		do_hardirq(desc);
 		cond_resched_all();
+		local_irq_disable();
 		__do_softirq();
-//		do_softirq_from_hardirq();
 		local_irq_enable();
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 		/*
 		 * Did IRQ affinities change?
 		 */
-		if (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), irq_affinity[irq])) {
-			mask = cpumask_of_cpu(any_online_cpu(irq_affinity[irq]));
-			set_cpus_allowed(current, mask);
-		}
+		if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
+			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
 #endif
 		schedule();
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-12  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12  2:43 [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process? john stultz
2006-05-12  5:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-05-12  7:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:39     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 11:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:59         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 12:53         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:03           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 13:06             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:19             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 17:47   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 18:04   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 19:16     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 20:04     ` Mark Hounschell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12  4:22 Edward Killips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060512055025.GA25824@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.