From: Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4464DF00.1050501@compro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1147457058.9343.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
john stultz wrote:
> --- 2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c 2006-05-11 18:37:36.000000000 -0500
> +++ dev-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c 2006-05-12 12:55:56.000000000 -0500
> @@ -724,6 +724,7 @@
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> do_hardirq(desc);
> cond_resched_all();
> + local_irq_disable();
> __do_softirq();
> // do_softirq_from_hardirq();
> local_irq_enable();
> @@ -731,10 +732,8 @@
> /*
> * Did IRQ affinities change?
> */
> - if (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), irq_affinity[irq])) {
> - mask = cpumask_of_cpu(any_online_cpu(irq_affinity[irq]));
> - set_cpus_allowed(current, mask);
> - }
> + if(!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]))
> + set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
> #endif
> schedule();
> }
>
>
>
>
Steve,
This patch seems to have made a huge difference in my 'complete
preemption' mode 'pauses' problem.
>From many seconds, even minutes at a time, to 5 seconds and less when it
even does happen???
It does still happen however.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-12 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-12 2:43 [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process? john stultz
2006-05-12 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 7:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:39 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:59 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 12:53 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 13:06 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:19 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 17:47 ` john stultz
2006-05-12 18:04 ` john stultz
2006-05-12 19:16 ` Mark Hounschell [this message]
2006-05-12 20:04 ` Mark Hounschell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12 4:22 Edward Killips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4464DF00.1050501@compro.net \
--to=markh@compro.net \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.