* [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches
@ 2006-05-10 17:38 Thomas Andrews
2006-05-29 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2006-05-29 17:47 ` Thomas Andrews
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Andrews @ 2006-05-10 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi,
I'm not about to submit a patch, but sometime in the future I will be
doing so, so I want to understand fully how it works around here.
Firstly some notes though:
In the module that I'm working on:
(a) I have found (and fixed) a bug in the original code.
(b) I have made enhancements that are not all related to one
another.
Should I submit seperate patches for all the different bits that I've
done, or should I (at least initially) submit one huge patch for the
lot?
Is there one specific person that I should send the patch(es) to, or is
the list the place where it all happens?
I'm pretty new to all this, so I can imagine that my code will have to
be massaged a bit to fit in properly..
Many thanks,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches
2006-05-10 17:38 [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches Thomas Andrews
@ 2006-05-29 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2006-05-29 17:47 ` Thomas Andrews
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2006-05-29 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Thomas,
Sorry for the late answer.
> I'm not about to submit a patch, but sometime in the future I will be
> doing so, so I want to understand fully how it works around here.
> Firstly some notes though:
>
> In the module that I'm working on:
>
> (a) I have found (and fixed) a bug in the original code.
> (b) I have made enhancements that are not all related to one
> another.
>
> Should I submit seperate patches for all the different bits that I've
> done, or should I (at least initially) submit one huge patch for the
> lot?
Alawys submit seperate patches. There are no exceptions to this rule.
> Is there one specific person that I should send the patch(es) to, or is
> the list the place where it all happens?
Yes, this list is the right place (assuming your work is related to
hardware monitoring or i2c). For bug fixes, or if you think your patch
is ready to be pushed upstream, it's a good idea to Cc me.
> I'm pretty new to all this, so I can imagine that my code will have to
> be massaged a bit to fit in properly..
Probably, but we try to be nice with newcomers, so don't worry :)
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches
2006-05-10 17:38 [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches Thomas Andrews
2006-05-29 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2006-05-29 17:47 ` Thomas Andrews
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Andrews @ 2006-05-29 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:36:08PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I'm not about to submit a patch, but sometime in the future I will be
> > doing so, so I want to understand fully how it works around here.
> > Firstly some notes though:
> >
> > In the module that I'm working on:
> >
> > (a) I have found (and fixed) a bug in the original code.
> > (b) I have made enhancements that are not all related to one
> > another.
> >
> > Should I submit seperate patches for all the different bits that I've
> > done, or should I (at least initially) submit one huge patch for the
> > lot?
>
> Alawys submit seperate patches. There are no exceptions to this rule.
>
> > Is there one specific person that I should send the patch(es) to, or is
> > the list the place where it all happens?
>
> Yes, this list is the right place (assuming your work is related to
> hardware monitoring or i2c). For bug fixes, or if you think your patch
> is ready to be pushed upstream, it's a good idea to Cc me.
>
> > I'm pretty new to all this, so I can imagine that my code will have to
> > be massaged a bit to fit in properly..
>
> Probably, but we try to be nice with newcomers, so don't worry :)
Thanks Jean. I've pretty much finished with my changes to scx200_acb.c
but I won't submit any patches until I've done some fairly heavy
testing because making the driver operate as a slave using interrupts
is quite a big change (in my opinion), and I don't want to submit
something that's buggy.
Regards,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-29 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-10 17:38 [lm-sensors] procedure for submitting patches Thomas Andrews
2006-05-29 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2006-05-29 17:47 ` Thomas Andrews
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.