From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
mehta kiran <kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Vijay Chauhan <kernel.vijay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4 vs 2.6
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:59:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060530015918.GA27940@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060530011208.GB12818@sgi.com>
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:12:08AM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 12:02:36PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I don't see why this *has* to be done on demand, though, unless the
> > export table is extremely large and only sparsely used. I might be
> > missing something.
>
> /mnt/data *.domain1.company.com(ro,sync) *.domain2.company.com(rw,sync)
I realize that the ip->client-name mapping is too large to preload into
the kernel.
It's the (path, client-name) --> export options that I wonder about.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-30 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-25 7:35 2.4 vs 2.6 Vijay Chauhan
2006-05-26 7:29 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-26 7:30 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-26 8:19 ` mehta kiran
2006-05-26 19:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-05-29 5:55 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-29 8:52 ` mehta kiran
2006-05-29 16:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-05-30 1:12 ` Greg Banks
2006-05-30 1:59 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2006-06-13 3:29 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-13 20:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-13 23:22 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-14 1:29 ` Greg Banks
2006-06-14 2:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-14 2:22 ` Greg Banks
2006-06-14 4:18 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-14 4:36 ` Greg Banks
2006-06-14 12:48 ` multiple mountds (was: 2.4 vs 2.6) Greg Banks
2006-06-16 3:52 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-14 19:40 ` 2.4 vs 2.6 William A.(Andy) Adamson
2006-06-15 3:17 ` Greg Banks
[not found] <fa.iaibikf.1l5injd@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.m5245vp.h0ukb5@ifi.uio.no>
2003-12-15 10:56 ` Anssi Saari
2003-12-15 17:25 ` David Ford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-01 6:20 XFS for 2.4 Nathan Scott
2003-12-01 14:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-14 1:08 ` 2.4 vs 2.6 Jan Rychter
2003-12-14 1:01 ` Roberto Sanchez
2003-12-14 11:23 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-14 18:09 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2003-12-14 1:53 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2003-12-14 2:01 ` coderman
2003-12-14 20:23 ` tabris
2003-12-14 7:05 ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-14 16:01 ` Roberto Sanchez
2003-12-14 17:32 ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-15 7:23 ` Harry McGregor
2003-12-15 7:51 ` Voicu Liviu
2003-12-14 11:24 ` Frederik Deweerdt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060530015918.GA27940@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=kernel.vijay@gmail.com \
--cc=kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.