Re: Patch for successful compilation on FreeBSD Release-6.1

["Yoshinori K. Okuji" <okuji@enbug.org>]

On Monday 12 June 2006 17:31, Harley D. Eades III wrote:
> --- grub2/configure.ac  Sun Jun 11 17:49:23 2006
> +++ grub2Hacked/configure.ac    Sun Jun 11 17:55:34 2006
> @@ -121,6 +121,15 @@
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(void *)
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(long)
>
> +# BSD checks.
> +AC_CHECK_HEADER([malloc.h],
> +               [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_MALLOC_H, [],
> +               [Define to 1 if you have the malloc.h header file.])],
> ,)
> +

Please use AC_CHECK_HEADERS instead. Usually, you don't have to use 
AC_CHECK_HEADER. See the autoconf manual for more details.

> +AC_CHECK_FUNC([memalign],
> +             [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_MEMALIGN, [],
> +             [Define to 1 if you have the memalign function.])], ,)
> +

Likewise, please use AC_CHECK_FUNCS instead.

> --- grub2/include/grub/util/misc.h      Mon Feb 14 18:07:01 2005
> +++ grub2Hacked/include/grub/util/misc.h        Mon Jun  5 15:25:38
> 2006
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <setjmp.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>

Can you tell me why it is necessary to include unistd.h here?

> --- grub2/util/grub-emu.c       Wed Apr 26 16:58:36 2006
> +++ grub2Hacked/util/grub-emu.c Mon Jun  5 15:26:30 2006
> @@ -18,7 +18,11 @@
>   */
>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_MALLOC_H
>  #include <malloc.h>
> +#endif
> +

I don't know why it is necessary to include malloc.h. IIRC, FreeBSD does not 
use malloc.h since 4.2 or something. In fact, other projects, such as KDE, 
stop including malloc.h in all platforms. Can you elaborate on this change?

Thanks,
Okuji