* [PATCH 1/4] minor optimizations to ondemand governor
@ 2006-06-28 20:49 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-06-30 5:08 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi @ 2006-06-28 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq; +Cc: alexey.y.starikovskiy, Dave Jones, Len Brown
ondemand_remove_slowdown_06.patch
Remove slowdown from ondemand sampling path. This reduces the code path length
in dbs_check_cpu() by half. slowdown was not used by ondemand by default.
If there are any user level tools that were using this tunable, they
may report error now.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Index: linux-2.6.17/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-2.6.17/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
* (C) 2003 Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>.
* Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
*
+ * Jun 2006 - Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
+ * Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
+ * - Remove slow down option and reduce the path length dbs_check_cpu
+ *
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
@@ -56,16 +60,14 @@ static unsigned int def_sampling_rate;
#define MIN_SAMPLING_RATE (def_sampling_rate / MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO)
#define MAX_SAMPLING_RATE (500 * def_sampling_rate)
#define DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (1000)
-#define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (1)
-#define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (10)
#define TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT (10 * 1000)
static void do_dbs_timer(void *data);
struct cpu_dbs_info_s {
+ cputime64_t prev_cpu_idle;
+ cputime64_t prev_cpu_wall;
struct cpufreq_policy *cur_policy;
- unsigned int prev_cpu_idle_up;
- unsigned int prev_cpu_idle_down;
unsigned int enable;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
@@ -87,24 +89,26 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *dbs_work
struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int sampling_rate;
- unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
unsigned int up_threshold;
unsigned int ignore_nice;
};
static struct dbs_tuners dbs_tuners_ins = {
.up_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD,
- .sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR,
.ignore_nice = 0,
};
-static inline unsigned int get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu)
+static inline cputime64_t get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu)
{
- return kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.idle +
- kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.iowait +
- ( dbs_tuners_ins.ignore_nice ?
- kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.nice :
- 0);
+ cputime64_t retval;
+
+ retval = cputime64_add(kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.idle,
+ kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.iowait);
+
+ if (dbs_tuners_ins.ignore_nice)
+ retval = cputime64_add(retval, kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.nice);
+
+ return retval;
}
/************************** sysfs interface ************************/
@@ -133,29 +137,9 @@ static ssize_t show_##file_name \
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dbs_tuners_ins.object); \
}
show_one(sampling_rate, sampling_rate);
-show_one(sampling_down_factor, sampling_down_factor);
show_one(up_threshold, up_threshold);
show_one(ignore_nice_load, ignore_nice);
-static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *unused,
- const char *buf, size_t count)
-{
- unsigned int input;
- int ret;
- ret = sscanf (buf, "%u", &input);
- if (ret != 1 )
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (input > MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR || input < 1)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
- dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor = input;
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
-
- return count;
-}
-
static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct cpufreq_policy *unused,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
@@ -217,12 +201,12 @@ static ssize_t store_ignore_nice_load(st
}
dbs_tuners_ins.ignore_nice = input;
- /* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle_up and prev_cpu_idle_down */
+ /* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */
for_each_online_cpu(j) {
- struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
- j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up = get_cpu_idle_time(j);
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_down = j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up;
+ struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
+ dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
+ dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j);
+ dbs_info->prev_cpu_wall = get_jiffies_64();
}
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
@@ -234,7 +218,6 @@ static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
define_one_rw(sampling_rate);
-define_one_rw(sampling_down_factor);
define_one_rw(up_threshold);
define_one_rw(ignore_nice_load);
@@ -242,7 +225,6 @@ static struct attribute * dbs_attributes
&sampling_rate_max.attr,
&sampling_rate_min.attr,
&sampling_rate.attr,
- &sampling_down_factor.attr,
&up_threshold.attr,
&ignore_nice_load.attr,
NULL
@@ -257,11 +239,10 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_g
static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
{
- unsigned int idle_ticks, up_idle_ticks, total_ticks;
- unsigned int freq_next;
- unsigned int freq_down_sampling_rate;
- static int down_skip[NR_CPUS];
+ unsigned int idle_ticks, total_ticks;
+ unsigned int load;
struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info;
+ cputime64_t cur_jiffies;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned int j;
@@ -271,10 +252,14 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
return;
policy = this_dbs_info->cur_policy;
+ cur_jiffies = jiffies64_to_cputime64(get_jiffies_64());
+ total_ticks = (unsigned int) cputime64_sub(cur_jiffies,
+ this_dbs_info->prev_cpu_wall);
+ this_dbs_info->prev_cpu_wall = cur_jiffies;
/*
* Every sampling_rate, we check, if current idle time is less
* than 20% (default), then we try to increase frequency
- * Every sampling_rate*sampling_down_factor, we look for a the lowest
+ * Every sampling_rate, we look for a the lowest
* frequency which can sustain the load while keeping idle time over
* 30%. If such a frequency exist, we try to decrease to this frequency.
*
@@ -283,36 +268,26 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
* 5% (default) of current frequency
*/
- /* Check for frequency increase */
+ /* Get Idle Time */
idle_ticks = UINT_MAX;
for_each_cpu_mask(j, policy->cpus) {
- unsigned int tmp_idle_ticks, total_idle_ticks;
+ cputime64_t total_idle_ticks;
+ unsigned int tmp_idle_ticks;
struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
total_idle_ticks = get_cpu_idle_time(j);
- tmp_idle_ticks = total_idle_ticks -
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up;
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up = total_idle_ticks;
+ tmp_idle_ticks = (unsigned int) cputime64_sub(total_idle_ticks,
+ j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle);
+ j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle = total_idle_ticks;
if (tmp_idle_ticks < idle_ticks)
idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
}
+ load = (100 * (total_ticks - idle_ticks)) / total_ticks;
- /* Scale idle ticks by 100 and compare with up and down ticks */
- idle_ticks *= 100;
- up_idle_ticks = (100 - dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) *
- usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate);
-
- if (idle_ticks < up_idle_ticks) {
- down_skip[cpu] = 0;
- for_each_cpu_mask(j, policy->cpus) {
- struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
-
- j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_down =
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up;
- }
+ /* Check for frequency increase */
+ if (load > dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) {
/* if we are already at full speed then break out early */
if (policy->cur == policy->max)
return;
@@ -323,50 +298,22 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
}
/* Check for frequency decrease */
- down_skip[cpu]++;
- if (down_skip[cpu] < dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor)
- return;
-
- idle_ticks = UINT_MAX;
- for_each_cpu_mask(j, policy->cpus) {
- unsigned int tmp_idle_ticks, total_idle_ticks;
- struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
-
- j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
- /* Check for frequency decrease */
- total_idle_ticks = j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up;
- tmp_idle_ticks = total_idle_ticks -
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_down;
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_down = total_idle_ticks;
-
- if (tmp_idle_ticks < idle_ticks)
- idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
- }
-
- down_skip[cpu] = 0;
/* if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early */
if (policy->cur == policy->min)
return;
- /* Compute how many ticks there are between two measurements */
- freq_down_sampling_rate = dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate *
- dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor;
- total_ticks = usecs_to_jiffies(freq_down_sampling_rate);
-
/*
* The optimal frequency is the frequency that is the lowest that
* can support the current CPU usage without triggering the up
* policy. To be safe, we focus 10 points under the threshold.
*/
- freq_next = ((total_ticks - idle_ticks) * 100) / total_ticks;
- freq_next = (freq_next * policy->cur) /
+ if (load < (dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold - 10)) {
+ unsigned int freq_next;
+ freq_next = (policy->cur * load) /
(dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold - 10);
- if (freq_next < policy->min)
- freq_next = policy->min;
-
- if (freq_next <= ((policy->cur * 95) / 100))
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ }
}
static void do_dbs_timer(void *data)
@@ -432,9 +379,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct c
j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
j_dbs_info->cur_policy = policy;
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up = get_cpu_idle_time(j);
- j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_down
- = j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle_up;
+ j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j);
+ j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_wall = get_jiffies_64();
}
this_dbs_info->enable = 1;
sysfs_create_group(&policy->kobj, &dbs_attr_group);
Index: linux-2.6.17/include/asm-generic/cputime.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17.orig/include/asm-generic/cputime.h
+++ linux-2.6.17/include/asm-generic/cputime.h
@@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ typedef u64 cputime64_t;
#define cputime64_zero (0ULL)
#define cputime64_add(__a, __b) ((__a) + (__b))
+#define cputime64_sub(__a, __b) ((__a) - (__b))
#define cputime64_to_jiffies64(__ct) (__ct)
+#define jiffies64_to_cputime64(__jif) (__jif)
#define cputime_to_cputime64(__ct) ((u64) __ct)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] minor optimizations to ondemand governor
2006-06-28 20:49 [PATCH 1/4] minor optimizations to ondemand governor Venkatesh Pallipadi
@ 2006-06-30 5:08 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-06-30 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi; +Cc: alexey.y.starikovskiy, cpufreq, Len Brown
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:49:52PM -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
>
> ondemand_remove_slowdown_06.patch
>
> Remove slowdown from ondemand sampling path. This reduces the code path length
> in dbs_check_cpu() by half. slowdown was not used by ondemand by default.
> If there are any user level tools that were using this tunable, they
> may report error now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.17/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.17.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ linux-2.6.17/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
> * (C) 2003 Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>.
> * Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
> *
> + * Jun 2006 - Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
> + * Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> + * - Remove slow down option and reduce the path length dbs_check_cpu
> + *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
I'll chop out this hunk. In-file changelogs are deprecated now that we've
got a sensible source control system.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-30 5:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-28 20:49 [PATCH 1/4] minor optimizations to ondemand governor Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-06-30 5:08 ` Dave Jones
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.