From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@osdl.org, marcel@holtman.org, fpavlic@de.ibm.com,
paulus@au.ibm.com, bcollins@debian.org, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:03:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060729170333.a45efeaf.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060729201555.GB8574@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:15:55 -0400
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> Patch to audit return code checking of kernel_thread. These fixes correct those
> callers who fail to check the return code of kernel_thread at all
>
>
Various people are running around converting open-coded kernel_thread
callers over to the kthread API. Generally that's a good thing, and error
checking should be incorporated at that time.
So there's probably not a lot of point in making these changes now - it'd
be better to work with the various subsystem owners on doing the kthread
conversion.
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,11 @@ cmm_thread(void *dummy)
> static void
> cmm_start_thread(void)
> {
> - kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0);
> + if (kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Could not start kernel thread at %s:%d\n",
> + __FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
> + clear_bit(0,&cmm_thread_active);
> + }
> }
This is OK as far as it goes. But really we should propagate any failure
back up to cmm_init() and fail the whole thing, rather than leaving the
driver hanging around in a loaded-but-useless state.
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@osdl.org, marcel@holtman.org, fpavlic@de.ibm.com,
paulus@au.ibm.com, bcollins@debian.org, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:03:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060729170333.a45efeaf.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060729201555.GB8574@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:15:55 -0400
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> Patch to audit return code checking of kernel_thread. These fixes correct those
> callers who fail to check the return code of kernel_thread at all
>
>
Various people are running around converting open-coded kernel_thread
callers over to the kthread API. Generally that's a good thing, and error
checking should be incorporated at that time.
So there's probably not a lot of point in making these changes now - it'd
be better to work with the various subsystem owners on doing the kthread
conversion.
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,11 @@ cmm_thread(void *dummy)
> static void
> cmm_start_thread(void)
> {
> - kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0);
> + if (kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Could not start kernel thread at %s:%d\n",
> + __FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
> + clear_bit(0,&cmm_thread_active);
> + }
> }
This is OK as far as it goes. But really we should propagate any failure
back up to cmm_init() and fail the whole thing, rather than leaving the
driver hanging around in a loaded-but-useless state.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 20:11 [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [0/3] Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:11 ` Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:15 ` [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3] Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:15 ` Neil Horman
2006-07-30 0:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-30 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-30 0:48 ` Neil Horman
2006-07-30 0:48 ` Neil Horman
2006-07-30 21:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-30 21:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-31 9:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-31 9:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-29 20:18 ` [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [2/3] Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:18 ` Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:20 ` [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [3/3] Neil Horman
2006-07-29 20:20 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060729170333.a45efeaf.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcollins@debian.org \
--cc=fpavlic@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtman.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=paulus@au.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.