From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, James K Lewis <jklewis@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
ens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608190103.05649.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060818222657.GL26889@austin.ibm.com>
On Saturday 19 August 2006 00:26, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> The recent set of low-waterark patches for the spider result in a
> significant amount of computing being done in an interrupt context.
> This patch moves this to a "bottom half" aka work queue, so that
> the code runs in a normal kernel context. Curiously, this seems to
> result in a performance boost of about 5% for large packets.
I guess this one still needs some work. We already have a bottom
half mechanism in the network layer, using the NAPI poll function
that is strongly serialized.
Linas, you wrote that you have tried doing the TX descriptor cleanup
in dev->poll(), but I think you missed the point that this function
needs should then be scheduled whenever necessary.
This seems a little strange, but I think what we need to do is in the
low-watermark interrupt call netif_rx_schedule(netdev) in order to
arrange for the ->poll function to be called in the next softirq.
Someone should probably document that in
Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt, I might end up doing that
once we get it right for spidernet.
Arnd <><
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
James K Lewis <jklewis@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608190103.05649.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060818222657.GL26889@austin.ibm.com>
On Saturday 19 August 2006 00:26, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> The recent set of low-waterark patches for the spider result in a
> significant amount of computing being done in an interrupt context.
> This patch moves this to a "bottom half" aka work queue, so that
> the code runs in a normal kernel context. Curiously, this seems to
> result in a performance boost of about 5% for large packets.
I guess this one still needs some work. We already have a bottom
half mechanism in the network layer, using the NAPI poll function
that is strongly serialized.
Linas, you wrote that you have tried doing the TX descriptor cleanup
in dev->poll(), but I think you missed the point that this function
needs should then be scheduled whenever necessary.
This seems a little strange, but I think what we need to do is in the
low-watermark interrupt call netif_rx_schedule(netdev) in order to
arrange for the ->poll function to be called in the next softirq.
Someone should probably document that in
Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt, I might end up doing that
once we get it right for spidernet.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-18 22:07 [PATCH 0/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet ethernet driver update Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:07 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet burst alignment patch Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet low watermark patch Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 23:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 23:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-20 6:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-20 6:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-08-20 10:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-20 10:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-23 21:36 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-08-23 21:36 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-08-23 22:03 ` David Miller
2006-08-23 22:03 ` David Miller
2006-08-18 22:23 ` [PATCH 3/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet stop error printing patch Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:25 ` [PATCH 4/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet ethtool -i version number info Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 22:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 22:26 ` [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 23:03 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2006-08-18 23:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-19 0:56 ` [RFC] HOWTO use NAPI to reduce TX interrupts Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-19 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-20 1:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-20 1:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-19 11:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-19 11:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-20 17:48 ` [RFC v2] " Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-20 17:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-21 20:40 ` NAPI documentation Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-21 20:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-21 22:05 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 22:05 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-21 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-21 22:17 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 22:17 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 23:52 ` [RFC] HOWTO use NAPI to reduce TX interrupts Linas Vepstas
2006-08-21 23:52 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-08-21 23:56 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 23:56 ` David Miller
2006-08-22 0:29 ` Roland Dreier
2006-08-22 0:29 ` Roland Dreier
2006-08-22 0:32 ` David Miller
2006-08-22 0:32 ` David Miller
2006-08-23 1:29 ` Shirley Ma
2006-08-23 1:29 ` Shirley Ma
2006-08-23 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half Linas Vepstas
2006-08-23 21:52 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-08-18 22:29 ` [PATCH 6/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet refine locking Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608190103.05649.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Jens.Osterkamp@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jklewis@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.